should governments support internet advancement or public transport
here are numerous factors to consider when assessing the importance of Internet access in society and its priority over public transport regarding government funds. While some may argue that in the advanced technologic world of today Internet acess is the most decisive element in determining a society's progression, opponents might argue that an advanced public transport system is a primitive necessity of every community. I agree with the latter, and I believe governement funds should be primarily expended on public transportation if needed. I will demnostrate further as follows.
Firstly, although the role of Internet availability in today's developmental measures of a country is undeniable, not everyone in a society uses Internet. Public transport, in contrast, is a kind of service that is vitually employed by everyone. The broad spectrum of people who use public transport includes society members as young as elementray school students and those as old as senior citizens over eighty years old. Evidently, promoting the quality and access to public transport benefits a greater number of individuals in a society, collectively. For instance, an elderly lady, who needs a lot of care, may not even know how to use the Internet, but she might take the bus everyday to buy groceries and pick up her medicine.
Secondly, Internet access is a more expensive service than public transport. People in my country often consider Internet service something that is relatively costly, and its quality is directly correlated with its price. In other words, higher prices mean better Internet quality and access. Accordingly, if companies or institutes require high-speed high-quality Internet service, they put aside a budget set for this matter, and other uses of the Internet, such as house services, could be obtained based on each individual's needs and at their own expense. On the contrary, public transport is the essential means to transfer people cheaply to their work, school, and many other places. People usually count on this service to be cheap, accessible, and funded by the government, and their daily functions depend on this. Thus, if the quality of this service declines, the community would likely become dissatisfied and complain tremendously until the issue is fixed.
In conclusion, I believe public transport and its constant modification with the purpose of better service, are among the most important fundamentals that define people's quality of life in a country. Almost every member of a community uses public transport, and it is regarded as the government's responsibility to provide for and enhance the public transports system. Therefore, government funds would be better spent on transportation rather than on Internet access.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-24 | jjj33333 | 60 | view |
| 2022-10-24 | jjj33333 | 60 | view |
| 2022-07-12 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 83 | view |
| 2022-07-11 | heman@saini | 70 | view |
| 2022-05-16 | sona1988 | 80 | view |
- is it better to get news from sources with similar views to yours or from those with different views from yours 83
- TPO 08 agree or disagree: television advertising directed towards young children (age two to five) should not be allowed. 90
- TPO05do you agree or disagree with the following statement? people today spend too much time on personal enjoyment - doing things they like to do - rather than doing things they should do. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- The article asserts that working in a four day workweek setting is extremely beneficial for both companies and employees However the lecturer completely disagrees with this idea and rejects all three reasons mentioned in the passage His opposite explanati 80
- TPO 18 Integrated Toreyya trees are endangered and there are three ways to preserve them first reestablish them in the same location in which it lived for 1000 years second move them to another location far from its Florida microclimate third preserve it 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Here
here are numerous factors to consider when a...
^^^^
Line 4, column 682, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...he Internet, but she might take the bus everyday to buy groceries and pick up her medici...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 871, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...if the quality of this service declines, the community would likely become dissat...
^^
Line 9, column 285, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...ic transport, and it is regarded as the governments responsibility to provide for and enhan...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 350, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'transports'' or 'transport's'?
Suggestion: transports'; transport's
...y to provide for and enhance the public transports system. Therefore, government funds wou...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, firstly, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, kind of, such as, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2341.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41898148148 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95959643093 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55787037037 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 743.4 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9193919022 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.210526316 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7368421053 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0526315789 5.45110844103 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384955647916 0.236089414692 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121982681121 0.076458572812 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888269853474 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258285669711 0.150856017488 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.097025682477 0.0645574589148 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 86.8835125448 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.