Some companies decide not to allow employees to discuss business by sending mails or messages on weekends. Some people believe that this policy is great. Others believe that this policy will discourage employees. What is your opinion and why?
Whether a company should allow an employee to discuss business by sending messages during the weekends arouses a heated debate. Some people believe that the policy is fantastic, while others argues that this regulation will discourage employees. For me, I disagree with such a policy. My reasons are as follows.
To begin with, companies should place an emphasis on workers' health, and not permitting them to talk about businesses via emails or texts helps them improve their health. As an example, my sister's financial company established a regulation similar to the one mentioned in the statement. As a result, every workers in her firm can take a full rest on Sunday and Saturday, such as hiking with their families or playing video game with their friends. Eventually, no one in her company has any mental health problems. On the other hand, my technological company, called AIdea, enacted a policy about allowing engineers to exchange machine learning model ideas during the weekday. Since engineers were concerned about their performance, they decided to train their deep learning models during the weekend. Nevertheless, such a malicious competition lead to numerous workers staying up late, and in the long run, nearly half of the workers become less encourage due to the fact that they got mental diseases like insomnia and depression.
In addition, companies focus on employees' working efficiency, but allowing them to discuss businesses on weekends will discourage employees and stifle their working efficient. Take my father's financial company as an example. His organization's policy allows workers to access customers' databases via Gmail in Saturday. However, most workers feel that they have plenty of times analyzing customers' behavior, so they often procrastinated. Eventually, the company's working efficiency was ranked last by many financial magazines in his region. On the other hand, my friend, Todd, was a cybersecurity consultant in An-Hua Security Firm, and his company's policy prohibited him from sending confidential business emails to his supervisors during the weekend. Therefore, when Todd was analyzing malicious network traffics during the workdays, he must fully concentrate on his missions since he could not bring his tasks home. Therefore, Todd could usually complete his weelky tasks before Wednesday due to his attentiveness, improving his motivation to work.
In conclusion, I maintain that allow employees to discuss business through messages or texts during the weekends discourages employees due to the aforementioned reasons.
- Some people believe that being far away from those we care about is necessary for us to understand the importance of our relationship Others believe that spending time with those we care about as much as possible can help develop our relationship Which do 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Your job has a greater effect on one s overall happiness than your social life does 80
- When you looking for a job which of the following ways would you choose 1 Ask all your friends if they know any vacancy 2 submit your resume to companies 3 look on line or newspaper 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Letting a friend make a mistake is better than saying or doing something that would destroy the friendship 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Patience is usually not a good strategy we should take action now rather than later Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 83
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether a company should allow an employee to d...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 54, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
..., companies should place an emphasis on workers health, and not permitting them to talk...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 645, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to model'
Suggestion: to model
... engineers to exchange machine learning model ideas during the weekday. Since enginee...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2181.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52151898734 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8819468575 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577215189873 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 668.7 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7146162604 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.05 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258360654024 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785950019127 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107197831204 0.0737576698707 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213688289179 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132269944792 0.0645574589148 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether a company should allow an employee to d...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 54, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
..., companies should place an emphasis on workers health, and not permitting them to talk...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 645, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to model'
Suggestion: to model
... engineers to exchange machine learning model ideas during the weekday. Since enginee...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2181.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52151898734 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8819468575 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577215189873 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 668.7 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7146162604 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.05 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258360654024 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785950019127 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107197831204 0.0737576698707 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213688289179 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132269944792 0.0645574589148 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.