In some countries, people are no longer allowed to smoke in many public places and office buildings. Do you think this is a good rule or a bad rule? Use specific reasons and details to support your position.
Cigarettes have been by far the deadliest and most harmful items used deliberately by people. Scientific research that was done last century proved that tobaccos are extremely hazardous for our health. And since then, governments around the world have implemented policies to stop people from using them. One of these policies is to stop smoking in public places, which I personally believe that it is a very good rule. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, cigarettes affect not only the person who is smoking, but also the people around him. In fact, breathing the smoke released in the air is just as harmful as actually using the product. Moreover, some results from experiments show that the harmful effect from cigarettes is higher in people who do not use tobaccos. This is because their body is not used to these kinds of substances that exist in the product. For instance, in the public spaces like restaurants, cafes, squares are a lot of people under the age of eighteen. The immunity in the young generation is lower and not strong enough. Therefore, they do not have the capacity to defend against more than five thousand chemicals that are part of a single cigarette. Thus, the damage on their brain and probability to have cancer when they grow older increases exponentially. These damages also apply to other generations but are less severe. Knowing all these facts, banning smoking in public spaces is a rule that makes a lot of sense to me.
Secondly, this rule is very effective in lowering the number of smokers beyond the public areas. The most common places to go out with friends or family to have fun are these environments where smoking is not allowed. As a result, smokers have to make a decision between cigarettes and having a good time with their loved ones. Even though, not everyone will give up their habit, it is still considered successful because some people will. My own experience is a compelling example of this, my mother has been a smoker for more than twenty years. Until recently, due to the war, our political and juridical environment have been chaotic. However, since the situation has started to improve government began to implement social policies with smoking being one of them, in order to improve the living conditions overall. And since then, my mother has stopped smoking gradually because she could not go out with us or her friends anywhere. So, had not it been for this policy, my mother would have kept smoking.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-17 | noobmaster69 | 83 | view |
| 2019-03-31 | hasan123456 | 70 | view |
| 2019-01-05 | spvpr | 70 | view |
| 2019-01-05 | spvpr | 70 | view |
| 2018-09-03 | mmm3 | 68 | view |
- Professors appearing on television 76
- A company is going to give some money either to support the arts or to protect the environment. Which do you think the company should choose? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- Torreya taxifolia 61
- In some countries, teenagers have jobs while they are still students. Do you think this is a good idea? Support your opinion by using specific reasons and details. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Overall the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today s world Use reasons and details to support your opinion 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
...nly the person who is smoking, but also the people around him. In fact, breathing the smoke released ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, thus, for instance, i feel, in fact, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2099.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 434.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83640552995 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51956707939 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555299539171 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 666.0 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.2100537962 48.9658058833 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.4583333333 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0833333333 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166196983635 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455062249433 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411440761276 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118463107181 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182951190123 0.0645574589148 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.