Some movies are serious, designed to make the audience think. Other movies are designed primarily to amuse and entertain. Which type of movie do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Genuinely, films created for various reasons including giving a motivation, making people to perceive controversial concept in human life, and expanding people’s knowledge by diverse forms of movie such as animation, series movies, and independent films. Even though many people desire to watch movies that are not dedicated for them to meditate. I strongly believe that movies should contain some desperate content in order to give wisdom to an audience. I feel this way for two reasons including by watching serious movies I become aware of controversial issues, for example, religious and I can gain experience which has dire consequences in order to avoid from unethical behavior.
First and foremost, films are one kind illusion of books which means by watching movies we can get information of doubtful topics in life including religious. Religious is one of the most wrangle concept in human history that many people have conflicted and always ended-up with tragedy. The movie called, Life of Pi, is the great film that tried to illustrate what is religious. In the movie, the main character, called Piscilla, lost his family and his beloved tame animals in the middle of the Pacific Ocean. He survived with only a few exotic predators including tiger, African hyenas, and orangutan on the same boat. To highlight, the only faith that he had was he will be saved with a help of one existence who lies above all deities, Hare Kirishna. In conclusion, hidden meaning of this film was if we just keep believing in something with full immersion, impossible things can turn into reality.
Secondly, even though life has full of unpredictable good results it has dire consequences which we don’t want to experience on our own, for instance, jeopardizing our lives by addicting some drugs. The movie named, Requiem for a dream is a compelling example of what I mean. It shows that group of people who got the habit of the drug has witnessed such agony by losing their beloved person, get in trouble, and one of them turns into lunatic by overuse of drug. This movie tried people to convince that everything has their own good and bad effect if we just misuse it our lives could be in treacherous threat.
To conclude, I strongly believe that movies should be designed for contemplate. Films aforementioned are good example of illustration of one of the disputable concept of human life, religious. Another one was the compelling example of we use something over and over again that turns into habit, we could end up our lives with full of misery.
- In some countries, teenagers have jobs while they are still students. Do you think it is a good idea? Support your opinion by specific reasons and details 76
- Some students prefer to attend in a class with the teacher who has taught by before while others prefer attend in a class with new teacher. Which one do you prefer explain why, use specific details to support your answer? 76
- color influence 86
- When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success. Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position. 83
- The twentieth century was great change. In your opinion, what is one change that should be remembered about the twentieth century? 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 691, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...order to avoid from unethical behavior. First and foremost, films are one kind i...
^^^
Line 2, column 664, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...o highlight, the only faith that he had was he will be saved with a help of one exi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, i feel, i mean, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2133.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97202797203 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73075704347 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536130536131 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 674.1 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5713726626 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160088649783 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571347071124 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521974336682 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104498522387 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418873191435 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.