Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People are having a hard time reaching a consensus on whether parents should encourage children to give money for higher marks or not. Some people beliefs that it stimulates them to study. But as far as I am concerned, I totally disagree with this statement. Many reasons support my point of view, and I would explore a few of the most ones here.
The primary reason we have to consider is that children would use it unnecessary things that kill their valuable time. It is generally believed that infants always do or are busy with something unproductive for them. Consequently, after getting money, they probably spend money on social media. My own experiences are a compelling example of that. When I was in class six, my mom always inspired me to do well in the exam. As a result, I always stood first in exams and got enough money. But, the capital I achieved most of the thrift for buying internet data. I visited and watched porn videos. Therefore, it negatively impacted my life as I acted unusually, and indeed, it led to a very distressful life later. So, my mom had not given me money; I would not have seen the porn video. However, having said this, giving money led them to go astray at an early time.
The second point that comes to mind is that they might use the money for consuming unhealthy food. Since they do not have a good sense of salubrious food items, they are vulnerable to it. For instance, my cousin stood first in the exam, and her mother gave me 5 dollars for it. But he ate some street food that caused her to get sick. We admitted her hospital because her condition was perilous. Given the factors above, I may conclude that parents ought to avoid giving money as it is not only waste their time by watching the video but also become active on their health by consuming food.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-27 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-16 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-01-14 | nikki07hung | 60 | view |
| 2023-01-14 | nikki07hung | 60 | view |
| 2023-01-04 | minammah | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Most advertisements make products seem much better then they really are Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- TPO 33 INTegrated Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland They date from the late Neolithic period around 4 000 years ago They are round in shape they were carved from several types of stone most are ab 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 329.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49848024316 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39946071059 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592705167173 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0370613001 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.4761904762 100.406767564 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6666666667 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95238095238 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212589504275 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560498434017 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397108608661 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142384347806 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00782828670497 0.0645574589148 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.6 11.7677419355 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.52 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.