With the advancement in the technology, mobile phones have become an integral part of our life for the communication and more. We cannot imagine a few hours without mobile phones. Similarly, one cannot imagine the mobile phone without internet. However, I personally think that the young children should not be given smartphones as there are more disadvantages of this as compared to advantages.
In my opinion, if young children are provided with the cell phone, it will act as a distraction for them. They will not be able to concentrate on their studies. Kids like to play games on the phones. And smartphone with internet gives them access to social media, youtube, online games etc. Which will have an adverse effect on the child's studies.
Smartphones for young children are the only source of time wastage. Nowadays, children are busy playing games on the phones. Instead, of playing outdoor they prefer to play games on the mobile phone which have ill effects on their health. Their eyesight becomes week at an early age. Nowadays, children are suffering from the problem of obesity. And the root cause of these health issues is not doing physical activity and overuse of mobile phone. Outdoor playing is very important for the development and good health of a child.
The mind of a child is very curious. Out of curiosity, a child can access the information through the internet which they are not meant to know at an early age. This will have bad effect on the fragile mind of the child. At the same time, it also affects their studies.
Thus, it can be said that young children should not be given smartphones. As the smartphones do more harm than good to the children. To be in contact with the child there are other ways that can be thought of. The only solution to be in contact with the child is not providing them with the cellphone.
- It is more harmful to compromise one's own beliefs than to adhere to them.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with thestatement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supportingy 50
- Modern transportation and shipping has made the world a better place to live. 60
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household. 50
- Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses to explain this decline.One hypothesis 73
- The following is a recommendation from the Board of Directors of Monarch Books. "We recommend that Monarch Books open a café in its store. Monarch, having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years, has a large customer base because 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 75, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ildren should not be given smartphones. As the smartphones do more harm than good ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, similarly, so, thus, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 323.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78328173375 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50435884136 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486068111455 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 472.5 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7558350954 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 64.375 100.406767564 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.4583333333 20.6045352989 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.20833333333 5.45110844103 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210472706904 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591450640375 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475779647442 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116330921041 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391003011221 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 11.7677419355 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.85 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.