Some people like doing work by hand. Others prefer using machines. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
With the advance of technologies, there are more and more useful tools invented and we contributes convenience of modern society to these astounding innovations. Even tough some people like doing work by hand, I prefer using machines since it is more effective and bring some benefits.
First, utilizing machines in my work certainly minimize the chance to cause error. Sometimes people may be too tired to continued their work or just distracted for a second and make a mistake. Some can be corrected immediately; however, there are some errors that are so subtle that people can hardly notice in the first place. On the contrary, with the help from machines, errors can be reduced and guarantee the quality of working experiences. For instance, I was asked to analyze a statistic consisting of over two thousand megabyte data. One number went wrong could result in totally opposite outcome. I chose a super computer to assist my analysis and it provided an error-detection feature, which was, if defined properly in advanced, allowing users to examine every illogical data that sent in it. Were it not for this function, my work would undoubtedly be time-consuming and stressful since I could not make any mistake.
Second, doing work with machines make is much easier and more efficient for me. When a machine is used to engage in certain jobs, they can cut efforts by requiring less labor to achieve my goal. For example, using elevator when I am carrying heavy stuff is much easier and less exhausting than taking stairs. Moreover, using a machine when doing work is efficient, it facilitates the process of doing my work and always guarantees that I can finish it on time. Such as using a computer to store and analyzing some data, the only work I have to do is input some numbers and push a button, and suddenly a well-organized data is created and stored in my computer in seconds.
To sum up, using machines in my work is undoubtedly beneficial. Machines not only require less efforts, less time-consuming, but also boost efficiency and reduce potential errors that could appear during my work. With these ideas mentioned above, I prefer working with machines.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-29 | Harutyun Aslanyan | 60 | view |
2020-01-16 | Kalima | 60 | view |
2020-01-15 | Royaaa | 90 | view |
2020-01-06 | Royaaa | 83 | view |
2019-12-28 | Noha M. Aburass | 70 | view |
- Learning is primarily a matter of personal discipline; students cannot be motivated by school or college alone. 78
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences. 50
- Movies are popular all over the world. Explain why movies are so popular. Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 76
- The following appeared in a letter from a firm providing investment advice for a client.Most homes in the northeastern United States, where winters are typically cold, have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating. Last heating season that r 29
- To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based on current trends, will double over the next 50 years, thus making existing dormitory space inadequ 30
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'we' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'contribute'
Suggestion: contribute
...e and more useful tools invented and we contributes convenience of modern society to these ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 91, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun efforts is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...y beneficial. Machines not only require less efforts, less time-consuming, but also ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, well, for example, for instance, such as, on the contrary, to sum up, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1815.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 366.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95901639344 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76527164734 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57650273224 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7081645203 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.833333333 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 5.45110844103 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253182311992 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835259024569 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897270348827 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171797937672 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744006335966 0.0645574589148 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.