Some people learn by reading about things. Others learn by doing things.
It seems that the foundation of all advances in the world is based on learning so that there are many ways to learn new things in life. Meanwhile, some people prefer to learn something by readings. But others believe that doing things is the best way of learning. In my opinion, learning by doing things has many advantages. I can mention some reasons to support my idea in the following.
First of all, experience is the most practical aspect of our life. As has been proven, most of the discoveries in the world are the result of try and error in doing things. Experience is not achieved without doing things. In my opinion, the reading thing helps us to create just a plan but to obtain the real result and to complete the process of the learning we must do it. For example, when I wanted to learn the English language, I bought kinds of resource books and dictionaries. At first, I could learn basic concepts fastly but gradually, I needed to practice it in real life to keep concepts on my memory. I could learn grammars only on paper. When I wanted to speak to somebody, I forgot them. So I tried to find some partners who were able to speak English well to learn and then improve my speaking skill by practicing and repeating it.
Moreover, doing things give us a wider perspective. When we learn something by reading, in probably, we can master on aspects that we read about them. While by doing it, we can discover other ways and methods and these lead us to be innovative and creative, in turn, resulting in improve and find new things. For instance, when I was a student, I worked on a project with someone as a team. We had to design an algorithm. We started to collect information and read some books and related articles in this regard. After a while, we thought that our algorithm will work correctly but when we presented it, we noticed that some functional aspects of the algorithm have not been considered. Because we did not implement it by programming and testing.
However, doing things needs more time and energy. On the other hand, we should prepare the right conditions to perform it but sometimes it is not possible. Also, in some cases, the theoretical aspect of the project is more important.
In conclusion, learning thing depends on a person's skills and abilities. I personally prefer to learn new things by doing them. This method not only gives us valuable experiences but also it allows us to be innovative to improve things. Thus, doing things has more stable effects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-15 | nguyenthaian0127 | 76 | view |
| 2023-10-08 | nguyenthaian0127 | 76 | view |
| 2023-10-08 | nguyenthaian0127 | 90 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | Bikramyoga | view | |
| 2023-07-05 | Zmx_6 | 70 | view |
- TPO 24 85
- TPO 46 80
- TPO 23 73
- Some people learn by reading about things. Others learn by doing things. 70
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.-Wait until the class or meeting is 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 142, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...coveries in the world are the result of try and error in doing things. Experience is no...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2062.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62331838565 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58703201017 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486547085202 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 623.7 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8495987091 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.1034482759 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3793103448 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.96551724138 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 16.0 4.88709677419 327% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366338447505 0.236089414692 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930246498526 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686880457584 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199001473679 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753669663743 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 11.7677419355 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.92 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.