With the development of the food industry, various kinds of food stores are popping up along the streets. Instead of preparing meals at home, people may grab something to eat on their way home from food stands or dine out at restaurants. Since eating out and having dinner at home both have their advantages, people tend to vacillate between these alternatives. From my perspective, despite the appeal of going out for dinner, cooking at home always appears to be the first choice.
Admittedly, dining out affords us an opportunity to relish myriads of delicious dishes, no matter whether we can make them by ourselves or not. The attractive pictures of dishes on the bills of fare or posters at restaurants constitute such an ultimate appeal to passers-by on the streets that they could not help but head into the stores. There is also no need to clean the dishes after dinner. As a result, when people are thinking of having a convenient meal that is tasty and delicate as well, their favorite choice will always be going to a restaurant.
Eating out at restaurants can indeed be enjoyable and convenient, but these advantages may inevitably lead to high prices. In order to pay the ballooning rent nowadays and the salaries of service-offering employees, the price of dishes tends to be a lot higher than the raw material cost. For instance, the price of a dish at some upscale restaurants may be three or four times the total cost of cooking the same dish at home, if possible. The costs of dining out frequently, in consequence, may be far too expensive for the small pocketbooks of ordinary people, which is the major reason why I favor preparing meals at home.
Apart from financial issues, food safety and healthiness are also of great consequence. Restaurants prepare food and cook dishes in kitchens hidden from common customers, which means food safety may not necessarily be guaranteed during processing. It is true that countless regulations and inspections have been carried out to oblige restaurants to produce safe and wholesome food, but these intangible rules are by no means enough anyway. Restaurants may use better ingredients just to pass such tests and acquire qualifications, and revert to using poor-quality materials afterward. Additionally, people cooking at home can select healthier oil or condiments of their own choice, while restaurants are inclined to choose the ones that can turn a handsome profit. In this way, preparing meals at home should be the optimum alternative for those longing for healthful diets.
In conclusion, even though eating out is attractive for most people, having meals at home should always be the first choice. It is pardonable to dine out occasionally, but it would be better to eat at home for ordinary people who are eager for fitness.
- Some People Prefer To Eat At Food Stands Or Restaurants Other People Prefer To Prepare And Eat Food At Home Which Do You Prefer Use Specific Reasons And Examples To Support Your Answer 90
- TPO 41 Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such har 80
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays 94
- High school students now cheat more than before in homework assignments by asking other students for answers Which of the following do you think is the most effective way to stop this phenomenon 1 Asking parents to monitor signing homework to prove no che 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, but, first, if, may, so, well, while, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 52.1666666667 151% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2342.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 468.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00427350427 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85608556927 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549145299145 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 719.1 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9787078092 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.1 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264965567934 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887473256951 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662052849233 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162167535132 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709473794262 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.