Some people prefer to go and visit the tourist attractions where there are many people. Others like the tourist attractions with fewer people, which one do you prefer?
Attraction places are vital elements in every tourists’ life when visiting them. Some visitors are absorbed to go to crowded areas, while others would like to go to less busy spots. I prefer going to less crowded locations. My reasons are substantiated in subsequent paragraphs.
The first reason worth mentioning is that saving money is the tourists’ priority. To clarify this notion, travelers want to visit many well-known places during their curiosity to gain most usage; The more time they remain in one place, the more money they will dedicate. In crowded places, Sightseers have to spend a lot of time staying to buy tickets in the line since they cannot buy entrance tickets on the internet to go to the relic areas and historic cities located in developing countries. Consequently, in the busy places, people who want to gain a sense of experience and learn feat of these historic or modern buildings have to remain more and more days to enjoy in the hotel, and they have to allocate more money for their meals. Were I to go abroad to view historic places, I would consider money in my pockets because of limiting my budget, so I would choose places where attending people are lower since crowded regions are undoubtedly prohibitively expensive.
Another point that makes me hold this view is that focusing on quiet sites gives me a sense which I myself create these carvings, buildings, paints, and to name but a few. To elucidate, many packed historical, such as the longest wall in China which many dwellings already live brings about a sense of disturbance and annoying. In the hustle and bustle of life, I cannot imagine going to busy places that not only would I reduce my stress by paying attention to masterpiece objects which leads to having true happiness and relaxation but also I would not able to see all details that artists try strongly to convey their meanings and words incorporating in artists’ Immortal works. As a result, under such a circumstance as a tourist, neither I nor visitors are less inclined to stay in bustling spots to visit even the best achievements.
To arrive at a conclusion, if I had a chance to be a tourist, I would choose to visit calm places. This is because I might able to save my cash and consume it to see other ancient places and because I will be able to attend to each point precisely without any chaos.
- Many criminals upon their release from prison return to society and commit further crimes Why do they do this How can the authorities prevent or reduce this phenomenon 73
- If people want to contribute to the society which of the following is the best way 1 riding bicycle or walking on foot 2 recycling the waste 3 buying local organic food 80
- Which of the following do you think is the best way for a student to make new friends joining a sports team participating in community activities traveling 73
- Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to 76
- 1 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Schools should be responsible for teaching students moral values State your opinion and explain why 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 975, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re undoubtedly prohibitively expensive. Another point that makes me hold this vi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, so, well, while, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74818401937 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65060965103 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547215496368 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.7137007416 48.9658058833 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.733333333 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5333333333 20.6045352989 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194550739359 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635840359223 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458154719193 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113004191629 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614132409081 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.