Some people prefer to live in a small town. Others prefer to live in a big city. Which place would you prefer to live in? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
The majority of people place great emphasis on living's environment. Living in a large city or in a suburb are obviously distinguished. Some people prefer living in a countryside, while others believe that living in a modern city is better. As far as I am concerned, I strongly prefer to live in a modern metropolis as there are splendid transportation and facilities. This essay will provide further aspects and examples to support this notion in the subsequent paragraphs.
First and foremost, living in a modern metropolis allows individuals to travel efficiently by a plethora of transport services. Although the tremendous cities excessively have vehicles on the streets, citizens are able to commute in the city with state-of-the-art diverse types of transportation, such as trains, public buses, and taxi services. Therefore, people who live in modern cities tend to travel faster and safer than those who live in the suburbs. To illustrate this, as a Bangkokian, when traffic is unbearable, I can use the Bangkok Skytrain convenient and punctual instead. If I am not in a hurry, I could travel by a public bus or boat. The various forms of transportation support people in the metropolises to choose a decent one.
Secondly, another fact that supports my standpoint is that living among convenient facilities provides people a quality life. A number of public infrastructures, such as theaters, department stores, and museums are built in order to fulfill people's needs. Moreover, cities have many medical facilities that are ready for servicing individuals in case of emergency, and those are easily accessible than those of the countryside. I can attest this from my own experience; my family and I underwent a car accident when we visited Buriram, a miniature town in the northeast region of Thailand. We needed to go to the nearest hospital as quickly as possible. However, Buriram had only one main hospital, and we had to only drive a car to that place. Fortunately, my family and I were eventually safe, but this case proved that there were no enough requisite medical facilities in the suburbs.
In conclusion, I firmly maintain the belief that living in a metropolis is better than living in a countryside. This is due to the fact that transportation in cities are convenient, and people will be safer and have a quality life by living with full facilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-02 | Kazeemolatide | 35 | view |
| 2021-09-02 | WatermelonUCLA | 63 | view |
| 2021-08-11 | nida fatima | 70 | view |
| 2021-04-19 | ursula | 60 | view |
| 2021-02-26 | edsonsimoes | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the opinion: People who cannot accept the criticism from others will not be successful at working in a group. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A job with more vacation time but a low salary is better than a job with a high salary but less vacation time Use specific reasons to support your answer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 89
- Some people say that computers have made life easier and more convenient Other people say that computers have made life more complex and stressful What is your opinion Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'livings'' or 'living's'?
Suggestion: livings'; living's
...ority of people place great emphasis on livings environment. Living in a large city or ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1991.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07908163265 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12579748258 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512755102041 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5129523667 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.55 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298078340837 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935111830323 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102631646239 0.0737576698707 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201631980248 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118852062574 0.0645574589148 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.