Some people prefer to spend time with one or two close friends. Others choose to spend time with a large number of friends. Compare the advantages of each choice. Which of these two ways of spending time do you prefer? Use specific reasons and details to explain your answer.
Friendship is a relation that is supposed to last a lifetime, especially because building such a bond takes time and efforts. There are persons who have tons of friends, who enjoy their company. As far as I am concerned, I prefer spending my time with one or two friends. I will explain my reasons in the following essay.
First and foremost, a person cannot have more than two or three real friends. When an individual affirms that he has thousands of fellows, he probably wants to say that he has many acquaintances. Evidently, a friendship means trust, respect, support, it means a lot of invested time to achieve all these issues. Therefore, since our time is limited, it is impossible to have so many friends. Personal, I want to be surrounded by people who trust me, who do not judge me and who can give me a sincere piece of advice. For instance, during high school I used to dance and my dream was to become a professional dancer. My best friends, Ana and Maria, supported and encouraged me all the time. They even came to my representations and helped me with my homework when I could not make it, as a consequence of my busy schedule. Conversely, some "well-intended friends" tried to make me feel like all this dancing thing was a waste of time. They sounded more envy than sincere. So, I have always chose to spend time with people who accepted me and my dreams.
To continue with, spending leisure time with a couple of friends creates more qualitative experiences and memories. Moreover it is easier to decide upon how should we have a good time, where to go and what to talk about. Otherwise, when may people are involved, everything transforms in a fiasco. My experience is a compelling example of this. Back in college, I went to the seaside with a large group of "friends". I found this experience as being very disappointing. First, our misunderstandings began when we had to choose a vacation resort. It took us two weeks, a lot of unnecessary long discussions and arguments, to come to an end. Not to mention that half of the group was not happy with the final destination. Second, we faced many problems there too, because we could not decide what restaurant was the best to eat, what club was the best place to have fun and so forth. Most of times we split in small groups and went on separate ways. Thus, spending time with many friends the same time is exhausting and
To summarize, it is better to spend time within a limited entourage. This is because individuals who are not real friends tend to judge you, creating a negative environment. Furthermore two or three friends are the best receipt to build nice memories.
- Many parts of the world are losing important natural resources, such as forests, animals, or clean water Choose one resource that is disappearing and explain why it needs to be saved Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 89
- TPO-46 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, medical information about patients traditionally has been recorded and stored on paper forms. However, there are efforts to persuade doctors to adopt electronic medical record systems in which informa 81
- TPO-43 - Integrated Writing Task Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitiv 85
- Every generation of people is different in important ways. How is your generation different from your parents’ generation? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your answer. 76
- TPO-05 - Integrated Writing Task As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand th 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1000, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'chosen'.
Suggestion: chosen
...re envy than sincere. So, I have always chose to spend time with people who accepted ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...e qualitative experiences and memories. Moreover it is easier to decide upon how should ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 405, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent to the seaside with a large group of 'friends'. I found this experi...
^^
Line 5, column 893, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the times') or simply say ''Most times''.
Suggestion: Most of the times; Most times
...he best place to have fun and so forth. Most of times we split in small groups and went on se...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1028, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... friends the same time is exhausting and To summarize, it is better to spend time...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 175, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...e you, creating a negative environment. Furthermore two or three friends are the best recei...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2204.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 471.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67940552017 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93980307324 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543524416136 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 691.2 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.912516121 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.0 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2413793103 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.62068965517 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30349162198 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781146936912 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100146770779 0.0737576698707 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194934665829 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523935937163 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 11.7677419355 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.