Some people prefer to work for large company. Others prefer to work for small company. Which would you prefer?
Nowadays, a prime and fundamental controversy about the issue whether a small business is convenient to work for or a big one is. Some people would claim that working for a large company is beneficial for the employees. However, as well as I am concerned, personally, I prefer to work in a small workplace for two following reasons.
The first and foremost reason that must be taken into account is the importnace of having a practical relationship among co-workers. A relevant example of this issue can shed light on this assertion. 3 years ago, when I was a member of an international art project due to saving global, we changed details of the program by starting new special groups into the main group of the artists. Moreover, every person played a crucial role in the problem related to his/her experience and interests. Thus, all the small groups were working at the same time for one goal. Also, an individual was able to focus on his/her specific type of job which resulted to a better peformance at the end. On the other hand, people could feel apt by being in a group of members with the same habits and thoughts.
The second reason that I prefer to illustrate is the impact of optional duties alongside the obligations from the boss of a big company. For instance, a recent research study at George Washington University between hundreds of students on the campus demonstrated important facts. Furthermore, when students are under the control of a manager to work with each other, the creativity of the work reduces noticebly. On the other hand, experts and psychologists believes that the new generation is addicted to democracy. Needless to say, the students prefer to be in a small group to see their influence on the progress of the project.
To sum up, I firmly believe in working in a small workplace for the following reasons. first, people in a small company could be closer to each other and this affects to the whole work appropriatly. What is more, in the modern society it is a vital fact to know that there is a common prefrenece between people to make choices by themselves.
- TPO 52 integrated 3
- TPO 36: Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- Some students prefer to study alone. Others prefer to study with a group of students. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Most people can solve important problems in their lives by themselves or with the help of their families Help from the government is unnecessary 75
- Should government spend more money on improving roads and highways, or on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways)? Why? Use specific reasons to develop your essay. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 88, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...ll workplace for the following reasons. first, people in a small company could be clo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, thus, well, for instance, as well as, to sum up, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 366.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7650273224 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78155495828 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551912568306 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0697983649 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.8888888889 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381130679762 0.236089414692 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102561076961 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0985261985705 0.0737576698707 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23254854243 0.150856017488 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125361693066 0.0645574589148 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.