The government is often confronted with various problems to deal with the budget they have. There has been an ongoing debate where some individuals think that the local administration should use the budget to support and protect the environment whereas arts enthusiastic believe that the budget should be allocated to encourage art-related programs. I firmly believe that the government should tackle the more urgent crisis at hand and should devote the extra fund to enhance the environment. I will explain the reasons behind this choice in the following explanation.
To begin with, it's a moral obligation for humans to protect the environment. There are myriads of anthropogenic activities leading to environmental degradation and we ought to do something about it. Global warming, deforestation, smog, acid rain, wildfires, floods are a few of the issues we are facing and the list goes on. If the funding is directed to preventive measures, we can provide a healthy atmosphere as a legacy to current and future generations. For instance, whenever I see my new-born baby getting sick due to pollution or dramatic weather change, a guilt-feeling automatically sinks in. This weather change is an alarming sign of us abusing the environment. So funding towards the environment can help facilitate a better future for human beings, animals, and plants.
Notwithstanding the above explanation, I know that art is a severely underfunded domain and deserves our attention. Having said that, I feel that private companies can fund the arts programs and attract the audience to appreciate the artists. People rely on arts for entertainment but their well-being is a bigger concern. I remember a theatre group in my town had lost a considerable amount of funding and the situation was very fragile. But the private companies stepped in, funded the group, and sponsored the events which saved the theatre group from closing down. Of course, private companies had their logo everywhere to show their significance and aids a great marketing strategy to rake in people's attention.
In conclusion, the decision behind funding the environment is appropriately called for due to critical scenarios, and that arts can be funded by private bodies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...e environment whereas arts enthusiastic believe that the budget should be allocated to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 16, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ollowing explanation. To begin with, its a moral obligation for humans to protec...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, well, whereas, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, of course, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30056179775 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06559783766 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612359550562 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7804742038 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.833333333 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27777777778 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217268261256 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052938036516 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481945525297 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117659287607 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567325882892 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.