.Some people think that the government should use extra money to fund programs to improve the environment. Others think that it is better for the government to spend money to support arts programs. Which option do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
These days a lot of highly debated issues confront and cause harms to today’s technological world for many ways. In my opinion, If I forced to choose from those two points, I would definitely prefer the former one. I feel this for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, Humans destroy their mother nature by their bare hands without even consider negative effects in the future. However, it is still critical to solving those environmental issues immediately because we take almost all the essential sources from nature which is deteriorating rapidly year by year on account of cruel actions of all humankind. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my country’s experience. A few decades ago, My country was appreciated as having the most beautiful and abundant in both wildlife and natural supplies. However, The coal companies acquired our natural resources easily and depleted all of them even they can’t be revived. As a result, A lot of endangered species are extinct and we purchase almost all the demands from other’s countries and it affects greatly on the economy so my country’s poverty has been flourished in recent years. This example demonstrates why the officials should concentrate on how to save the ecosystem issues.
Secondly, Nowadays many scientists are looking for a new life from outer spaces due to the fact that there is a lower chance to live on Earth for a long time. It is very expensive to conduct researches and invent new technologies to know whether there are any living organisms are found on another planet. Drawing from NASA’s investigations, they conducted many experiments which some them grounded in failures and even killed a few astronauts because of unsuccessful technologies and lack of researches in early times. Therefore, it is essential to concern about environmental issues and to do something efficient before it will too late to save.
I strongly believe that the government should spend more money to develop the environment instead of paying attention to artistic programs. This is because it is crucial to saving our planet which we mostly depend on its natural resources and because it is precious and a waste of time to search the new planet for us.
- In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projectsis to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attacka project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people has a widerrange of knowledge, exp 85
- Do you agree or disagree computer games is waste of time and children should not be allowed to play 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. Use specific reasons and examples to support you 70
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 80
- TPO 32 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 174, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'save'?
Suggestion: save
...grams. This is because it is crucial to saving our planet which we mostly depend on it...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, i feel, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1954.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11518324607 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92083725337 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596858638743 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7911821679 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.125 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0936952112712 0.236089414692 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0308938074859 0.076458572812 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419723144182 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0652950952045 0.150856017488 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040388992784 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.