Some people think governments should spend as much money as possible exploring outer space (for example, traveling to the moon and other planets). Other people disagree and think governments should spend this money for our basic needs on Earth. Which one of these two opinions do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice.
The issue of spending money on exploring outer space is the most complex and sensitive one. Although some people support the plan, others believe that investing money on missions or space projects should be discouraged. However, I personally agree with the idea that governments should spend money on research into the moon and other planets. For one, it could provide governments with new sources of water and energy. Moreover, it is a good strategy for governments to protect our planet, the Earth.
The first and the foremost reason why I support the plan to invest money on exploring other parts of the solar system is that it would be a good opportunity to obtain new water or energy resources. Unfortunately, the lack of energy supply is now one of the biggest concerns for almost all countries. Therefore, scientists are willing to discover new means to solve this problem and among potential sources, it seems that other planets are possessed some fascinating sources that could be exploited for this purpose. For example, according to a recent project, scientists were able to extract and save the heat form certain volcanoes on Mars’s surface that is likely to be transferred and practically utilized in numerous industries. Not only this, the discovery of the existence of frozen water on the moon or some planets such as Venus was interesting for many research teams. Finding all these sources in other plants and on the moon suggest new energy and water resources for human being on the Earth.
Furthermore, it is supposed that exploring outer space helps governments efficiently protect the Earth. Hypothetically, it is possible in a number ways. Firstly, other planets are likely to be suitable place for human being to live on. As a consequence, people would be inclined to build their houses on the newly discovered planets and in turn, we would be witnessed by less destruction of the grasslands or forests on the Earth. Second, it is predicted that it is possible for many developed societies to transfer half of their population to other planets by the year 2025. Obviously, the less residents live on the earth, the less environmental pollution we would experience. Presumably, the probability of living on other planets makes it possible to less damage to the environment and protect the Earth form further destructions.
Overall, taking into account all these factors, investing money on exploring outer space is not only wasting money, but also it provides governments with new sources of energy and water and it helps governments save the Earth for next generations
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-11-16 | epidemiology1 | 91 | view |
- Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize U 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation 71
- Underwater whales produce loud noises known as songs Scientists use whale songs to study the movements for migrations of groups of whales Recently scientists discovered something unusual a single solitary whale whose song is unlike that of all other known 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Books are not needed any more because people can read information on computers 87
- Some people believe that it is helpful to view a challenging situation as an opportunity for personal growth Others believe that reimagining challenging situations this way occupies too much of the focus one needs to face challenges effectively 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 592, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun residents is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...lanets by the year 2025. Obviously, the less residents live on the earth, the less e...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, moreover, second, so, therefore, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2180.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10538641686 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81545975236 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484777517564 0.524837075471 92% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4893697224 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.736842105 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4736842105 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406687902927 0.236089414692 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128662420362 0.076458572812 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693527708035 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268585183641 0.150856017488 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121302333692 0.0645574589148 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.