Some people think historical sites should be open to the general public but others think historical sites should be only open to experts and researchers, which one do you prefer?
In the modern era and progressive world where we live, there is a general consensus among the government’s authorities on preserving historical arts and objects. The controversial question which arises here is whether historical sites should be opened to all people, or they just should be open to researchers and experts. When it comes to me, I strongly believe that it is a prudent course of action to let all the people go and visit there. there are several noticeable reasons to support my idea, two of which I will delve into in the following essay.
First and foremost, allowing all people to take the opportunity to visit historical places, countries’ economic situation might thrive remarkably. To be more specific, it goes without saying that there are a few numbers of people who do not fully appreciate arts and historical places and they can cause many damages to them, which can be considered as irreversible repercussions, but to surmount the current economic climate which is dominated all around the world, societies should benefit all their potential to overcome financial burdens. Indeed, the tourist industry is among the most profitable industries in the world which can bring countries with an inordinate amount of money, and not only does it result in attracting a large number of people from different countries and money accompanied by, but also it creates jobs for unemployed people. Statistics show that, a country like Egypt and a city like Venice, which their economic condition is mostly dependent on the tourist industry and do not possess natural resources like petroleum such as many countries, annually earn almost billions of dollars through of which.
Second, visiting historic places enlarges people’s knowledge and provides some quality time and escapist activities for families to enjoy. To clarify more, in the hustle and bustle of today's hectic life, people need some form of enjoyments to spent their leisure time on them, and as they are among the resources of every country then it is the governments’ responsibilities to provide facilities for them to enjoy from evenly. generally speaking, the most portion of the budget which disburses to preserve these sites is derived from the taxes is paid by people; therefore, they should be allowed to take the advantages of visiting them including enhancing their information and experience. Moreover, owing to the fact that history repeats itself, communities can learn the past generation’s losses and turn them into lessons, prevent dire consequences of their actions and decisions.
To wrap it up, not only do people escalate their understanding about their past by visiting historical places and enlisting them in order to use in their daily lives, but also governments themselves would take substantial benefits from it like decreasing the high rate of unemployment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-15 | Roya Ebrahimi | 90 | view |
| 2020-04-15 | Roya Ebrahimi | 90 | view |
| 2020-04-15 | Roya Ebrahimi | 90 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | woeiz | 93 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television advertising directed towards young children aged two to five should not be allowed Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 93
- Some people think historical sites should be open to the general public but others think historical sites should be only open to experts and researchers which one do you prefer 90
- Some people think historical sites should be open to the general public but others think historical sites should be only open to experts and researchers which one do you prefer 90
- Some people think historical sites should be open to the general public but others think historical sites should be only open to experts and researchers which one do you prefer 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'consensus'.
Suggestion: consensus
...ressive world where we live, there is a general consensus among the government’s authorities on p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 444, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
... let all the people go and visit there. there are several noticeable reasons to suppo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 730, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...d not only does it result in attracting a large number of people from different countries and mon...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 429, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Generally
...cilities for them to enjoy from evenly. generally speaking, the most portion of the budge...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2421.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26304347826 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88553772758 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576086956522 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 754.2 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 20.1344086022 174% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.940354987 48.9658058833 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 186.230769231 100.406767564 185% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.3846153846 20.6045352989 172% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250226865989 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0903488353573 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10497908363 0.0737576698707 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155617430544 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0828030797846 0.0645574589148 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.0 11.7677419355 178% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.95 58.1214874552 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 10.1575268817 166% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.82 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.01818996416 127% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 86.8835125448 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.0537634409 159% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.