Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
As everything in life is like a coin that has two different sides, people must weigh the pros and cons before jumping to conclusions. After all, every question or topic requires careful deliberation in that there are always multiple variables to a truth. Even though some adamantly believe that it is essential to save land for species that are about to extinct, others think it is more vital to benefit from the ground in favor of individual requirements. I believe that each inch of our earth should be exploited for human activities.
First and foremost, the majority of individuals would agree with the notion that the overall world population is growing massively. This is because the death rate decreased significantly due to the recent medical advancements which lead people to live more. Consequently, the growth in population number demands more land for building houses for citizens to live in, more factories to produce life necessities and more farms to plant crops for food. All in all, saving endangered animals is important and could be beneficial but providing human beings with life essentials is much more crucial.
On top of this, the protection of rare species can be managed by many other ways such as new birth techniques. In other words, many countries are using advanced methods for breeding which succeeded to offer sustainability for animal types facing the risk of disappearance. Take The Chinese Panda, for example, it was at very high risk of extinction, but the government invented several methods to protect them. One of those was using a gun to shoot the semen of the male inside the ovaries of the females externally. The aim of this procedure was reaching the most suitable conditions for giving birth to a healthy young panda, and accomplishing the highest success rate. On the other hand, governments have limited resources to cope with the needs of its citizens which elevate day after day. Thus, the only way to compensate that increase is to reserve lands for infrastructures and other living requirements.
In conclusion, we are living in a small world that should be wisely managed. Otherwise, we are going to suffer in the foreseen future. Keeping land for human purposes is a top priority and mandatory to face the fast-growing population. On the other hand, the protection of endangered species can be significantly achieved through science and technology rather than land allocation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | Dimitrina | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | Manu2525 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | bishoy | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | MOHD ARAFAT | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | MOHD ARAFAT | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- do you agree or not about telephone is much important than television 90
- toefl writing test January 28, 2019 TOEFL independent writing test 1 with sample essay — Question:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better to have a job that you enjoy to do rather than a job with high income.Give reasons a 73
- TPO-39 3
- Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, so, thus, after all, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2040.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85670702033 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3301014219 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.368421053 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0526315789 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36842105263 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233078583371 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618800818088 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461615312584 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135817087104 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424176218054 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.