Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this
Children are precious assets of any nation. The investment on them will lead the country to the sustainable development. It should be stressed that they are like unripe fruits, schools and families should help them in the way of maturity and learn them how to be helpful for society. Some people believe that it is the responsibility of schools to develop their integrity with they society, others think that family plays a vital role in this situation. I adamantly believe schools should learn children how to be a proper member of the society. I feel this way because of two main reasons that I am going to explore in the following essay.
First and foremost, schools have more experience. Parents have limited knowledge about how to raise a child and most of their information has been achieved through years of trial and error. Admittedly, parents cannot make a mistake on their children because their pitfalls are irreversible. On the other hand, schools can hire experts that have the well-rounded knowledge and experience regarding how to raise a child. Without any doubt, numerous research has been done to find a most beneficial way to teach student their role in the society. Accordingly, teachers and schools' consultants with less error rate can lead children to desired outcomes of society.
Secondly, schools are a simulator of a big society. If a student would be helpful for the other students, his parent and the school can conclude that he will be useful for society too. Accordingly, to strengthen this kind of behavior among students, schools can introduce numerous kind of programs during the formative years of a child education. My son's school, for example, for enhancing the feeling of generosity want students to donate whatever they can to children who live under poverty line and their parents cannot provide basic needs of their children included notebooks and pencils.
In a nutshell, I firmly believe that schools should teach their students how to be useful for their society. I feel this way because schools have more knowledge than families and schools are a small society that student is taught in them.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Modern agriculture does damage the environment, but providing food for the growing population around the world is more important than protecting the environment. @aalaeeTOEFLiBT 76
- Do you agree or disagree? It is better to travel abroad to visit different countries when you are younger rather than when you are older. 3
- Your friend has the opportunity to choose either one of two types of majors (fields of study), which one of the following two majors do you think is a better choice, and why?A major that would allow him to finish years of study and get a degree sooner (so 76
- 38 The following appeared in a memo from the new vice president of Sartorian, a company that manufactures men's clothing."Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulties in obtaining reliable supplies of high quality wool fabric, we discontin 74
- some people think that we should keep away from others to improve our relationship, because being away from people remind us of how important they are. others think we should always stay with others to have a good relationship because we can communicate w 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 593, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hildren included notebooks and pencils. In a nutshell, I firmly believe that sch...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, i feel, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1786.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01685393258 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.644683433 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488764044944 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 537.3 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1654812106 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2222222222 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348722496521 0.236089414692 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117205413173 0.076458572812 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107548050787 0.0737576698707 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226729547446 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0971026875744 0.0645574589148 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.