Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this
Children are precious assets of any nation. The investment on them will lead the country to the sustainable development. It should be stressed that they are like unripe fruits, schools and families should help them in the way of maturity and learn them how to be helpful for society. Some people believe that it is the responsibility of schools to develop their integrity with they society, others think that family plays a vital role in this situation. I adamantly believe schools should learn children how to be a proper member of the society. I feel this way because of two main reasons that I am going to explore in the following essay.
First and foremost, schools have more experience. Parents have limited knowledge about how to raise a child and most of their information has been achieved through years of trial and error. Admittedly, parents cannot make a mistake on their children because their pitfalls are irreversible. On the other hand, schools can hire experts that have the well-rounded knowledge and experience regarding how to raise a child. Without any doubt, numerous research has been done to find a most beneficial way to teach student their role in the society. Accordingly, teachers and schools' consultants with less error rate can lead children to desired outcomes of society.
Secondly, schools are a simulator of a big society. If a student would be helpful for the other students, his parent and the school can conclude that he will be useful for society too. Accordingly, to strengthen this kind of behavior among students, schools can introduce numerous kind of programs during the formative years of a child education. My son's school, for example, for enhancing the feeling of generosity want students to donate whatever they can to children who live under poverty line and their parents cannot provide basic needs of their children included notebooks and pencils.
In a nutshell, I firmly believe that schools should teach their students how to be useful for their society. I feel this way because schools have more knowledge than families and schools are a small society that student is taught in them.
- Do you agree or disagree? People meet many problems in their daily life and they can solve them by themselves or with the help of their families, so the help from the government is not necessary 70
- Some people think university professors should spend more time doing research while others think they should spend more time educating students. What is your view? 71
- "Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerne 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the Mayor of the city of Hillview:"In order to alleviate the serious unemployment problem in our town, we should encourage Autotech to build its automobile manufacturing plant in our area. The Hillview landfill, 54
- Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty.W 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 593, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hildren included notebooks and pencils. In a nutshell, I firmly believe that sch...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, i feel, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1786.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01685393258 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.644683433 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488764044944 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 537.3 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1654812106 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2222222222 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348722496521 0.236089414692 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117205413173 0.076458572812 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107548050787 0.0737576698707 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226729547446 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0971026875744 0.0645574589148 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.