At work or school, you might encounter a problem that requires creativity -for example, you are given a task to complete that is very different from other tasks you do. In work or school situation that requires you to think creatively, would you prefer to
In this competitive world we are currently living, problem-solving is one of the main capabilities that anyone should possess. People whether during their formative years of education or in their job, they encounter with various problems and if they cannot find a creative way to get out of it, it would have numerous detrimental impacts on the lives. This trend prompts a controversial issue, whether people should work as a group to be innovative and propose a solution or they can work alone on it. I adamantly prefer to work alone. I subscribe to this idea because I would more productive in this way and members would interfere with my thoughts.
First and foremost, people are less efficient in the group working. When a group is formed, the responsibility of the group is on the shoulder of all members. Accordingly, they are not enough motivated to reach a proper outcome and easily neglect they responsibility. As a result, they prefer to spend most of their time on by-products. For example, they tend to allocate their time to laughing and storytelling which are completely irrelevant to the ultimate task of the team. This issue has a considerable effect on the efficiency of the group. However, if someone works alone, he would not be faced with these problems because, in case of failing to accomplish the project on time, he would see the consequence of it personally. According to a research done by Yale University, group working declines the productivity. The researchers wanted from ten individuals to peel the potatoes as a group and then they counted total numbers of peeled potatoes. They also repeated this experiment in a way that people should peel the potatoes individually. By making a comparison between averaged peeled potatoes of the group and numbers of them when they did this task solely, they noticed that people working individually peeled more potatoes.
More importantly, a member of the group may try to play a dominant role. As a matter of fact, some of the members of the group would have the leader characteristic meaning that they influence other members and they would attract to them easily. In this circumstance, members prefer to accept all the dominant's behaviors and solutions without thinking for a second. This would lead the group to reach an unacceptable result. But working alone, you would work on the project and problem on your own. Take my personal experience as an example. My thesis in economics master degree was about how inflation rate will affect the tax income of the government. To evaluate the correlation between these two factors, I should define a creative model. I read various latest papers but I was not able to find the model. To tackle this problem, my supervisor formed a group with students who had a similar difficulty. Because of one of the member who tries to impose his idea on others and they accepted it immediately, it took a long time to reach a consensus. It does not need to say that when we designed a model, our supervisor was completely shocked by the result since it was chiefly wrong.
In a nutshell, I prefer to work solely, because group working not only is not productive, but also the likelihood of deviating from the main goal of the group is a lot to a great extent. Furthermore, since people have the various daily task, fixing a time for the meeting is quite difficult.
- It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts. 70
- Some governments spend a lot of public money training up individuals to be successful in international sporting events. Some people believe that this money should be spent on things that will benefit the general public instead.To what extent do you agree 89
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People now can better protect the environment than they could in the past 76
- Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than 16
- The following appeared in a memo from the Mayor of the city of Hillview:"In order to alleviate the serious unemployment problem in our town, we should encourage Autotech to build its automobile manufacturing plant in our area. The Hillview landfill, 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 781, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g to a research done by Yale University, group working declines the productivity....
^^
Line 3, column 1240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...king individually peeled more potatoes. More importantly, a member of the group ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...y a dominant role. As a matter of fact, some of the members of the group would have the lea...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed to say that when we designed a model, our supervisor was completely shocked by...
^^
Line 5, column 1187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the result since it was chiefly wrong. In a nutshell, I prefer to work solely, ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, then, for example, as a matter of fact, as a result, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 81.0 52.1666666667 155% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2801.0 1977.66487455 142% => OK
No of words: 577.0 407.700716846 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85441941075 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90110439584 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84249375759 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 281.0 212.727598566 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487001733102 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 882.9 618.680645161 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 23.0 9.59856630824 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2218803406 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3666666667 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2333333333 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150111197363 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416839168201 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574661512027 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0979020886229 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178408068732 0.0645574589148 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 86.8835125448 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.