Some people think that they can learn better by themselves than with a teacher. Others think that it is always better to have a teacher. Which do you prefer?
There are two different attitudes about learning systems. Some people believe learning by themselves is better and leads to more beneficent results, while others believe to learn new things and to obtain a profession they need teacher to teach them. It is true that learning by themselves increase people self-confidence, but personally I believe to learn new things teacher can be useful. Some reasons will propose in following paragraphs.
First of all, teachers have knowledge enough about their expert and know how to transform it to others. To learn new thing by themselves, people must spend more time and energy for research in library or in websites, however; using teacher can solve these problems easily. For example, two years ago I had problem about my master final thesis and could not approve an equilibrium. I searched about it for two months and read more than five related books, but I could not find solution. Finally I asked my supervisor about this problem. Surprisingly, he found its answer just after two days. Based on my experience, the easiest way to obtain knowledge is teacher.
Furthermore, teachers have experience about educating and use the best way to teach subject to students. Teachers had different students before us, who were in different talent and ages. Because of their job they job they acquire some features such as being patient, transfer knowledge and being kind, so students will feel comfortable and learn subjects easily from their teachers. According to the new article with published by education system institution (ESI), a person who had a teacher and used his/her teacher to learn has more efficiency than who tried to learn by himself/herself.
In conclusion, in my point of view learning by using teacher is better than learning by themselves. This essay mentioned two major reasons to support this idea.
- Some people like to do only what they already do well Other people prefer to try new things and take risks Which do you prefer 53
- fake 2 3
- fake 5 3
- universities should give the same amount of money to their student's sports activities as they give to their university library. agree or disagree ? 86
- It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 361, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'things'' or 'thing's'?
Suggestion: things'; thing's
..., but personally I believe to learn new things teacher can be useful. Some reasons wil...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 487, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...d books, but I could not find solution. Finally I asked my supervisor about this proble...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'job they'.
Suggestion: job they
...erent talent and ages. Because of their job they job they acquire some features such as being pat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 304.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.125 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74643277827 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588815789474 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6384154633 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6470588235 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8823529412 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286291935016 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870031097265 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822421768035 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18207397361 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636934845354 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.