Some students are taught different subjects by different teachers while other
students are taught by only one teacher all day long. Which do you prefer? Why or why not?
There are many ways of teaching nowadays, but from my point of view, it is more worthwhile for students to have different teachers with different lessons. The more diversity of teachers there is, the better students will perform.
To begin with, not all students understand a single style of teaching. This is important because a student’s success in school depends on their understanding of the lessons and sometimes students need to have different teaching styles. An example of this is the differing experiences my friend and I had in high school. My friend’s school usually taught students by assigning each teacher to one class for all subjects, while my school assigned different teachers to different classes depending on the subject. I understood all my subjects because I had teachers who taught the topic of his/her specialty. As a result, I got good grades during my high school. On the other hand, my friend had one teacher, one style of teaching, which he did not like; thus, his final grades suffered. Accordingly, it is more beneficial for students to have a variety of teachers because it has an impact on a student’s understanding and evaluation.
Another reason I believe multiple teachers is preferable is that humans need refreshment by changing places and meeting different people. If people do the same thing every day, this routine becomes mundane. This situation could be the same with students who have one teacher teaching them all day. Students may get bored in their classes, and eventually, this will impact a student’s grasp of the lessons. Therefore, I think changing teachers is more effective in avoiding tedious situations, which may negatively affect a student’s comprehension.
In conclusion, I think it is more beneficial for students to be taught by different teachers because it is better for students’ knowledge, which considers an integral part of their academic lives.
- TPO-28 - Integrated Writing Task Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him 73
- TPO-29 - Integrated Writing Task Large numbers of dinosaur fossils have been discovered in deposits on Alaska's North Slope, a region that today experiences an extremely cold,arctic climate. One hundred million years ago, when those dinosaurs were alive, 81
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing Task Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses expla 83
- TPO-27 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and ex 76
- TPO-22 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... integral part of their academic lives.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, i think, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 311.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27652733119 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06800268601 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511254019293 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1149573312 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5625 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337305007738 0.236089414692 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119894943512 0.076458572812 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689995856604 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216942408831 0.150856017488 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309471040181 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.