Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other student prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer . Use reasons and examples to support your answer.
There are some moot points about the methods which students prefer for their classes. The question of which classes are more beneficial for students and which classes are more preferences from students has aroused as a subject of controversy among academicians. When it comes to my position, with weighing up the pros and the cons, I strongly subscribe to the point that the class with open discussion between professors and students is better than a class with no discussion. I have some reasons, the most outstanding of which will be aptly explicated in the ensuing paragraphs.
The first reason worth discussing here is in open discussion classes, students engage with everything in the class, therefore, they ask more questions and hear more answers. These issues help them to boost their education. To be more specific, in open discussion classes students are free to explain their viewpoints. They can change their faults and find out their foible in every class. As a case to the point, I vividly remember when I was a student at the university. I had a class with professor Domiry who studied in the united state. Thus he believed that open discussion class is very lucrative for students, therefore, we had a very useful with him. Due to this method, I learned mathematics engineering very well and I gained a top score in that class. My personal experience competently corroborates to the point that open discussion classes help students to know their positive and negative aspects.
By the same token, another paramount reason to be mentioned here is that scholars assert that open discussion classes fortify students learning ability and boost their acquirements. My personal example demonstrates this reality, two days ago I watched documentation on the BBC channel. In that program scientist set up an experiment to measure the impact of open discussion classes on students learning the ability. Hence, they selected a group of students who were top students. In one class they experienced open discussion method and in another class, they only had a lecture. The corollary of this test revealed that in open discussion class those students gained more knowledge. My personal experience shed some light to the point that open discussion classes are more fruitful for students.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned reasons, I reiterate that, I vehemently prefer open discussion classes because these kinds of class not only help students to be active in the class but also, reinforce their learning ability. I strongly suggest to professors to choose this method for their classes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-31 | 30vil | 70 | view |
| 2018-09-03 | Dragut | 70 | view |
| 2018-06-21 | nik.201094@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2016-05-02 | Samar 1984 | 70 | view |
- Many companies provide important products or services, but also damage the environment. Somepeople believe that the best way to stop companies from harming the environment is to require them topay a penalty such as higher tax or a large fine when they cau 73
- Some adults believe that nowadays children’s behavior is worse than children’s behavior was in the past. These adults have suggested three actions that parents can do to help children ages 5–10 behave better (for example, by speaking more respectful 73
- Tpo 49 66
- Tpo 42 80
- Is it better to enjoy your money when you earn it or is it better to save your money for some time in the future? Use specific reasons and details to support your opinion. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 541, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...Domiry who studied in the united state. Thus he believed that open discussion class ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, well, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2185.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 426.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12910798122 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81337122301 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485915492958 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 669.6 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6143182812 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3181818182 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3636363636 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.31818181818 5.45110844103 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390650207516 0.236089414692 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126575836359 0.076458572812 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811932999976 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27569995694 0.150856017488 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0838488656099 0.0645574589148 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.