It goes without saying that a sundry of people there are who back the idea that studying alone, a person will be more concentrated, but there is no general consensus among individuals whether this approach is suitable for everyone or not. However, I have personally subscribed to the view that learning with other students is more beneficial. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
The first and the most prominent reason that comes to my mind is that by being a participant in a group, students can solve their problems. Of course, all of us face difficulties while studying and need to find a solution for them. Studying with a group, we can ask them how to solve our mistakes. For example, when I was a student at the university, I used to be prepared for exams all by myself and hardly did I ask to help when I have confronted a tough question. As a result, my scores were not acceptable, nevertheless, I persisted to study alone. One day, my friend, who was my classmate also, came to my home and compelled me to study for the exam with him. It is obvious that I enjoyed cooperating with him, moreover, I did my best on that exam.
Secondly, never can anyone ever cast a shadow of doubt on the significance of motivation in doing tasks. Being involved with persons, who are not only friends but also opponents, to achieve a specific goal is the best stimulus to work diligently. My brother's experience is the best instance for illustrating this concept. Jim is an indifferent person whom nothing stimulates him to work hard. He is also lazy in studying never does he try to obtain the best results. Regardless of his intelligence, he is also a social person with a lot of friends. One of his friends is his classmate this semester and the presence of him makes my brother delighted. They spend a lot of hours in the library of the university and study with each other most of the time. However, I am happy that Sam has raised my brother's motivation to be successful in his lessons.
To put in the nutshell, I think it is better to study with a group of students. It has better results in the light of solving problems and having a desire. It is high time we increased our abilities in group activities.
- You have received a gift of money. The money is enough to buy either a piece of jewelry you like or tickets to a concert you want to attend. Which would you buy? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 56
- TOEFL integrated writing: communal online encyclopedia 83
- You have received a gift of money. The money is enough to buy either a piece of jewelry you like or tickets to a concert you want to attend. Which would you buy? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 70
- Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'consensus'.
Suggestion: consensus
...l be more concentrated, but there is no general consensus among individuals whether this approach...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, for example, i feel, i think, of course, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 409.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50611246944 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73355319211 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535452322738 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5290457075 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7727272727 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5909090909 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159009961747 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485326356683 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417477769979 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0961450540678 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0195669438479 0.0645574589148 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.