Sometimes people are assigned to work in a group on a project. Do you agree or disagree
with the following statement? The group will be helped more by a person who is willing to do
what other group members want than by a person who often strongly insists that things should be
done in a way that is different from what the group wants to do. Use reasons and examples to
support your position.
fix mistakes
Nowadays group work is an important concept that has many issues to be discussed on. Nobody can cast a shadow of doubt on the fact that effective communication is a crucial factor in this regard. In other words, if team members have a good relationship with each other, they would definitely meet the team goals. I, personally, subscribe to the idea that people who are not persisting on what they want - which is opposing the group goals - will be beneficial for the group rather than those who are stubborn, for the following reasons:
First of all, a team with members of the same idea is more likely to reach their goals sooner rather than the team with a person who is strongly insisting on his or her ideas. The reason is crystal clear, the first team will not face a lot of challenges in persuading members, while the other team must put energy and time in order to satisfy the opposing member and they may encounter many conflicts. Consequently, the first team's rate of progress will be ascending and the team will reach better results rather than the other team. Furthermore, the first team will meet the group aims more quickly and in time. this would be beneficial for all members of the first team due to the fact that working with no conflicts would be pleasant for the team boss and would be a ground for team members to receive encouragement from their boss or the project investor.
Second, it is obvious that calmness is a principal factor in a collaborative environment. In other words, if the members of the group are not at ease they cannot do their task well. Therefore, they cannot concentrate on their job and this causes low efficiency. In contrast, a team with people who prefer other members' ideas rather than theirs will benefit from a friendly environment which is a vital factor in group work. groups that have good and intimate relationships with each other are often more successful than the other groups.
In conclusion, by taking into account all the above reasons, the group's success depends on members' behavior noticeably and if there is a person in the group who insists on his or her opinion and ignores others' opinions will be a barrier for the team which prevents the team from reaching its goals.
- Sometimes people are assigned to work in a group on a project. Do you agree or disagreewith the following statement? The group will be helped more by a person who is willing to dowhat other group members want than by a person who often strongly insists th 60
- Sometimes people are assigned to work in a group on a project. Do you agree or disagreewith the following statement? The group will be helped more by a person who is willing to dowhat other group members want than by a person who often strongly insists th 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...p work is an important concept that has many different issues to be discussed on. Nobody can c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...orn, for the following reasons: first of all, a team with members of the same...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 403, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
... and they may encounter many conflicts. consequently first teams rate of progress will be as...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 403, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: consequently,
... and they may encounter many conflicts. consequently first teams rate of progress will be as...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 609, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...he group aims more quickly and in time. this would be beneficial for all members of ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 425, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Groups
... which is a vital factor in group work. groups that have good and inmate relationships...
^^^^^^
Line 19, column 66, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
...into account all the above reasons, the groups success depends on members behavior not...
^^^^^^
Line 19, column 92, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'members'' or 'member's'?
Suggestion: members'; member's
... reasons, the groups success depends on members behavior noticeably and if there is a p...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, in contrast, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77099236641 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51990441928 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478371501272 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 546.3 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.2834921566 48.9658058833 195% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.928571429 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0714285714 20.6045352989 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 5.45110844103 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329484872844 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125689855668 0.076458572812 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0970633714955 0.0737576698707 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23848516279 0.150856017488 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326670448513 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.1575268817 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.