sometimes we are assigned to work in a group on a project. do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
the group will be helped more by a person who will be willing to do what other group members want than by a person
who often strongly insists that things should be done in a way that is different from what the group wants to do
There are some moot points about working in a group. The question of whether it is better to the member of a group do everything on the horizon of a group or in a different way has aroused as a subject of controversy among academicians. Everyone has his own zeitgeist. I have some reasons, the most outstanding of which will be explicated in the ensuing paragraph.
The first reason worth discussing here is that teamwork is one of the significant aspects of working in a group, as a result, it is very important for each member of a group to work toward the group horizon. If someone works in a different way toward the group, it will lead to failure for that group. Teamwork ameliorates the group's ability to become successful in their duties. As a case to the point, I vividly remember when I was a student at the university. I had a research project about site investigation characteristics of Iran. In that project, I had to survey and test the soil of some sites in various places. We established a group for doing that project. One of the members of our team did not work similar to the group goals consequently give rise to decrease our pace the way. After that, we decided to substitute this person with another one. In a word, it is better for members of a group work toward the team aims.
By the same token, another paramount reason to be mentioned here is that working toward the what member of a group wants, lead to fortify the group potential. If a member works in a different way this activity make disagreement among whole members and weaken the group ability. My personal experience demonstrates this reality when I was a high school student we had a competition among all the high schools of my town in the football game. We had a sheer team which all member had one goal. The goalkeeper of our team worked in a different way toward our team. The corollary of this work leads to some loose for our team, therefore our Capitan resolved to change the goalkeeper and choose another one thus, our group became champion in that completion. My personal example shed some light to the point that has a pure group lead to prosperity.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned reasons, I reiterate that it is better for all members of group work in the same way in the group. This action not only ameliorates the group potential but also, increase the team ability for prosperity
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-21 | saeideh | 90 | view |
| 2019-01-03 | 30vil | 66 | view |
| 2018-07-04 | Mehrdad.imn | 76 | view |
| 2018-01-31 | duskcloudxu | 73 | view |
- Essay topics: TPO-47 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Universities should require every graduating students to take public speaking courses. Give specific examples and details to support your answer. 70
- Tpo 42 80
- Following are three choices to protect the local environment. Which one do you think is the best and explain why.1. Plant trees and create gardens2. Local shops do not provide consumers with plastic bags3. Take public transportation and reduce the use of 71
- The widespread use of the internet has given people access to information on a level never experienced before. How does this increase in the availability of information influence life in today's world? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
...e moot points about working in a group. The question of whether it is better to the member of a group d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...everything on the horizon of a group or in a different way has aroused as a subject of controversy...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 225, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ard the group horizon. If someone works in a different way toward the group, it will lead to failu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 327, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
...or that group. Teamwork ameliorates the groups ability to become successful in their d...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... the group potential. If a member works in a different way this activity make disagreement among w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 526, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...goal. The goalkeeper of our team worked in a different way toward our team. The corollary of this ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, so, therefore, thus, as a result, by the same token, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1970.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56018518519 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70854700012 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453703703704 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 624.6 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3707718462 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.652173913 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7826086957 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52173913043 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88709677419 266% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3075769811 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104198006753 0.076458572812 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769761285801 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214245627407 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565475712626 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.