space exploration advantages
Human being has been seeking to find a better place to live. A place full of peacefulness and foods in order to have a comfortable life without tension. Scientists came up with an idea that maybe another planet is a suitable place for living. I strongly agree with this line of thought and believe that the government can consider the other planet as an alternative and enhance our ability in space exploration because of two reasons.
First, although moving to another planet is a big deal and requires taking a risk, our earth is getting polluted and is not safe for living. Dwellers of earth have polluted their residence without thinking about their next descendant. In some parts of our continents, there is no place in order to take a healthy breath so that people migrate to another place and make the new place worst than what the first place was. The first reasons behind this disaster are cars and traffic jams brought about by vehicles. Researches have shown that forty percent of our cities are not safe for children, elders, and inspiratory patients. In addition, they found out that there is an Earth-like planet with a clean atmosphere and full of Oxygene for breathing. Thanks to government efforts in order to find an alternative planet, now we know that we can go there in the worst case.
Second, the other problem with our planet is lack of enough resources for living. Deficiency in water resource exploited during the last centuries and inadequate fossil fuel which is a vital component for living to compel our government to look for an alternative place for their citizens. This is crystal clear that all companies and all part of industries have needed fossil fuels and without it, life is not possible on earth. Besides, by over-extraction of oil and gas, in some countries, we have many difficulties in order to cope with the need of the industrial part of countries. Furthermore, exploiting water resource like groundwater have given rise in poverty and malnutrition in poor resource countries. Owing to inaccessibility to clean water, many diseases are widespread, and most of the people pass away because of those mentioned reasons. Had our government not invested in space exploration, we would not have had a place to migrate when all water and fuel resources are used up. But now we know that one day we can go to another planet for living.
In conclusion, Investing more fund in finding another planet as an alternative is a hope to leave another place when all our water and fuel resources are finished up. Moreover, people not only can get rid of the pollution of cities but also can have healthy lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-20 | prakriti malla | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-20 | prakriti malla | 76 | view |
| 2022-12-01 | wqx | 71 | view |
| 2022-12-01 | wqx | 70 | view |
| 2022-01-08 | wxr031 | 73 | view |
- rights of animal 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. 76
- Some people say that the internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- advantages and disadvantages of free health care 85
- Teachers were more valued and appreciated in the past more than today. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: WORST_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worse'?
Suggestion: worse
...to another place and make the new place worst than what the first place was. The firs...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, look, may, moreover, second, so, well, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2210.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86784140969 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67815777379 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488986784141 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 691.2 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6671525723 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.238095238 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.619047619 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.19047619048 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0332524218219 0.236089414692 14% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0107768973997 0.076458572812 14% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357169575778 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0273026876986 0.150856017488 18% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366608182859 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.