Students in a university club want to help others, but they can only choose one project a year,
which one of the following is the best?
1. Helping those students in a nearby primary school with reading and mathematics;
2. Helping people who cannot afford to build or rent a home to build a house;
3. Visiting and assisting elderly people with daily tasks.
A glance at people’s attitudes toward club activities bring to the light a question that has been asked several times, namely, whether student should assist other students in their education or undertake projects related to building house for poor people. Although most of my classmates think that it is better to build house for disadvantaged people, I, as a graduate student, believe that it is better to assist students at primary school students to understand their course materials more efficient.
The foremost reason why I am supporting this idea lies in the fact that children are the future of a country and if we do not raise well-educated children, we cannot have a developed country. To be more specific, if we have knowledgeable students, they improve the country and after several years there is no need for any assistant. If we help students to understand how to solve math questions, it is likely to find them at university several years late. Therefore, it is more essential to have great students to support our country.
Another subtle point that I should deem is the fact that all other activities have temporary outcomes, while improvement of education has permanent fruits that all can enjoy it. For example, even if we build 100 houses, after ten or twenty years they still need shelter because they cannot afford maintenance costs, and our effort is useless. Hence, it is better to help students rather than working on temporary projects.
Admittedly, there are some advantages of assisting poor people and elderly people. Recent studies show that the crime rate is higher in countries that have more disadvantaged people. It means that if we reduce the rate of poverty, young people do not commit criminal activities anymore. Nevertheless, I still think that it is not a big issue compared to the benefits of improving the education.
Due to the aforementioned argument explored in the previous statements, I highly recommend students to help elementary school student nearby in grasping their courses and build a better place to live. I wish a great future for our offsprings.
- Like many creatures, humpback whales migrate long distances for feeding and mating purposes. How animals manage to migrate long distances is often puzzling. In the case of humpback whales, we may have found the answer: they may be navigating by the stars, 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The more money people have the more they should contribute to charity 45
- TPO21 – Independent: A/D? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. 89
- Agree or disagree?Freindship is waste of time and we have to spend our time on sth valuable. 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1763.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06609195402 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79907331125 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554597701149 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3168962285 48.9658058833 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.533333333 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213712908139 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670210628286 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060575619718 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115794930108 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488111488878 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.