For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.
Spending money on the education of very young children is essential. However, significant funds and grants for universities can have an enormous impact on the successful development of a country for two reasons, which I will explore in the following paragraphs.
First of all, university projects and thesis topics have great potential, for most of them can be beneficial when there is enough support and equipment. For example, many projects in the field of civil engineering can help benefit the construction sites and optimize the use of materials, and therefore the costs of it. For this reason, it can be more important to start by spending money on universities.
Secondly, by providing university funds and supporting projects, professional students emerge from these universities to develop the system in industry or society. In my experience, a society that does not provide for universities loses the interest of young graduates to help their country to develop and become more prosperous. It is certainly clear to see how talented young people can help a country's development when they are linked to their related field of work.
In conclusion, I believe that it is more important for the government to spend money on universities to help grow the foundations of improvement and excellent future for next generations.
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future 76
- Hail pieces of ice that form and fall from clouds instead of snow or rain has always been a problem for farmers in some areas of the United States 76
- The Plain of Jars is an archaeological site in the Southeast Asian country of Laos At the site hundreds of large stone jars ranging in size from one to three meters are scattered across the countryside These numerous large containers are around 2 000 year 78
- The Plain of Jars is an archaeological site in the Southeast Asian country of Laos At the site hundreds of large stone jars ranging in size from one to three meters are scattered across the countryside These numerous large containers are around 2 000 year 78
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1127.0 1977.66487455 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 213.0 407.700716846 52% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29107981221 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.48103885553 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07586630309 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 212.727598566 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596244131455 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 618.680645161 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.6003584229 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.463975748 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.222222222 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 5.45110844103 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429805309601 0.236089414692 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190862042704 0.076458572812 250% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131968777411 0.0737576698707 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275883780545 0.150856017488 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0937063950003 0.0645574589148 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.