Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they already know how to do well
A controversial issue relating to what kind of qualities would make a person successful has been brought to the attention of the public. Relevant authorities are urged that some individuals who try new things and take risks would obtain prodigious achievements than people who only do what they are adept at. From a personal point of view, the above statement is agreeable for some reasons as below.
To begin with, attempting fresh things would produce some positive effects in the long run. To be more specific, if adults could learn some advanced knowledge as well as innovative technologies related to their majors, they could apply these progressive techniques which they have tried before to create a number of useful productions and acquire accomplishments in the future although it seems unnecessary now for some workers who learn those skills. In this case, it is necessary for employees to try updated expertise in advance so that they would earn not only money but also a great reputation. On the contrary, if the staff merely does what they are good at and barely know improved knowledge, there would be some high-level replacements that could take the place of their labor after several years since plenty of high technologies would generate. Therefore, individuals who are still doing what they are skilled at may lose their values in the society.
What is more, taking risks means that people would get a valuable or discontented result, both these results would induce many precious experiences for them. The worst case is that someone may receive a bad outcome through taking risks. By analyzing this consequence, he would realize some mistakes and would not make them in the later mission. Thus, people would accumulate a great deal of valid acquaintances through the faults and gain attainments eventually. For myself as an example. I took an important exam in the past, however I did not get an excellent grade. What I found from this test were numerous mistakes, such as I did not read the question carefully. Later, I quickly corrected those errors and learned some advantageous test skills. Under these circumstances, I ended up with a better score than I had ever achieved so that I got a lot of honors.
Finally, when workers always do what they have already known how to be well and learn little new intelligence, which is bad for their progress. In contemporary society, only employees who keep learning could win the competition around the market. From what was discussed above, people would not be satisfied with what they have possessed.
To sum up, from what has been discussed above, if someone expects to gain success, he should constantly receive reformatory thoughts and never be afraid of taking risks since all those processes would provide them treasured experience.
- There is now evidence that the relaxed pace of life in small towns promotes better health and greater longevity than does the hectic pace of life in big cities Businesses in the small town of Leeville report fewer days of sick leave taken by individual wo 50
- summarize the points in the passage being sure to explain the deline of the yellow cedar described in the reading passage 83
- Because the use of technology such as computers in classrooms for young students has led to many improvements in learning some people believe that there should be no limits on the number of hours that young students spend using technology during school da 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement the best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide 70
- summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the points that what might have caused the extinction of the sea cows mentioned in the reading passage 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, well, kind of, such as, as well as, on the contrary, to begin with, to sum up, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2344.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 465.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04086021505 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73517107835 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574193548387 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 719.1 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.8208592796 48.9658058833 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.619047619 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47619047619 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285349493953 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746838844543 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878616859614 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16977553525 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0804428727159 0.0645574589148 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.