Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well.
People have long been seeking ways to achieve success in their lives. Most people state that it is better to do what you have already known well to become successful in your life rather than doing something risky and new. However, I tend to argue that taking risks and doing new things have far greater impacts on one's success. In the following essays, I will vindicate my stance through two noticeable reasons.
To begin with, taking risks could be a significant motivating force to enhance versatility, making it easier for a person to attain success. It means that when people take risks in carrying out a particular work, they both study any related available sources and ask people who are experts in their fields, trying to cope with the obstacles they face and preventing failures. Thus, by engaging in such activities, people can enrich their understanding in various fields and as a result, they can successfully solve the problems. For instance, last year, I had a project with one of my professors in the field of the eating pattern of mice. When I was busy doing research on mice, another professor suggested me to help her with the experiments based on the eating behavior of fish which I knew nothing about. Actually, by accepting this work, I took risks as I did not know whether I could manage my time properly to do observations on both majors or not. But working with her taught me a lot about this filed and even I became interested in this subject. Therefore, not only can I do both subjects properly but I can also expand my knowledge in order to use them in new conditions I face. This example shows that the more risks people take the more successful person they become.
Another equally significant point is that by doing new things, people become more creative because when they confront new obstacles, their brain uses all its capacity to both overcome and solve problems. To illustrate this, last day I read an article in the field of neuroscience. The author suggested that when his colleagues and he were doing observations on the brain of people who did different things during their lifetime and did not stick to things they were skillful at, they found that these people had more developed brains. So, they concluded that the more developed their brain gets, the more creative they become. Thus, creativity helps people create diverse solutions to deal with difficult circumstances, making it easy to experience success.
All in all, I believe that doing various things and taking risks not only can provide people with more knowledge and versatility but also increase people's creativity. That is why I highly recommend that people participate in novel and risky activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | thakannv | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | naziii | 86 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | sarah halawani | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | nusybah | 70 | view |
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects (TPO 33) 60
- when teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 70
- For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. 76
- TPO 25 73
- If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stance through two noticeable reasons. To begin with, taking risks could be a s...
^^^
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...elated available sources and ask people who are experts in their fields, trying to cope...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2257.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 462.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88528138528 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5936950451 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534632034632 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 692.1 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4624612955 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.85 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414665646637 0.236089414692 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113399310658 0.076458572812 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960039784891 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258906756002 0.150856017488 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681355674779 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.