parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past-TPO 28
Parents play a pivotal role in their children's education. While most people believe that in the past, parents were more involved in the education of their children, I tend to argue that parents today get involved in their children's education more in comparison with the parents in the past. In the following essay, I will vindicate my stance through two noticeable reasons.
To begin with, parents today are more knowledgeable and erudite compared to parents in the past. In this regard, they can provide their children with more help in their education. For instance, my cousin studied mathematics at university. As a result of this, she helps her child with her math problems like teaching her or providing some math questions in order to prepare her for her exams. However, my cousin’s parents did not finish their studies, providing her with no aid with her mathematical problems. Therefore, the more educated parents are, the more involved they can be in their children’s education.
Another equally significant point is that in the past, parents wanted to have more than 4 children. In this regard, they had not enough time allocating for each of their children’s education. On the contrary, today parents tend to have only one or two children, having enough time helping their children in their education. Thus, according to the survey conducted, the more children every family has, the less chance they have to involve in their children’s education.
Last but not least, today, the advent of technology particularly the internet and also, the improvements in the educational system inform parents about the importance of their children’s education. Consequently, parents in order to encourage their children to study hard, give them their support like helping them with their courses, employing a tutor and so forth. In the past, however, parents were not well-informed about the fact that education can act as a vital role in their children’s future, not involving in their educational issues.
All in all, nowadays parents get involvements in the process of their children's education more than the parents in the past. This is because parents today are more literate. Furthermore, parents today not only have fewer children but also get enough information about the necessity of their involvement in their children's education. This is why I think that parents today have more involvement in their children's education compared to parents in the past.
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects (TPO 33) 60
- Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities 78
- teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. 70
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only 3 days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work 5 days a week for shorter hours TPO 30 70
- For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, i think, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2104.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29974811083 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92875296314 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.44080604534 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 644.4 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9179246212 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.2 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.85 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.559073288462 0.236089414692 237% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.243688207681 0.076458572812 319% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168068769868 0.0737576698707 228% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.414041884133 0.150856017488 274% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131455158485 0.0645574589148 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.