A teacher is considered as an instrument to transform a kid into knowledgeable being. As this is a very important instrument in everyone life, as it lays the basic foundation to understand things around us. So it is important that the instrument is able to connect the dots well and explain the things in a way that students would able to understand them and explore them. If there isn’t connect or sync with the teacher and children then that instrument i.e teaching is considered ineffective. So I support the idea that A teacher’s ability to relate well with students and with suffice knowledge in a subject is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. The following are reasons for my stance:
First of all, if the teacher is able to think in student’s shoe. Then the teacher would able to express and approach the teaching in a way, where students can connect the dots easy. I would give an example to illustrate my point, so back in school, our chemistry sir approach was to just jot down the points on the board and we would copy that in our notes. So by this approach of teaching, we felt we aren’t learning anything. Whereas our art class was more interesting, the professor has taken us to a museum and try to explain the artist painting by showing their paintings. So the approach of teaching plays a vital role even though every teacher is expert in his own field.
Secondly, if the teacher is able to relate well with the students, then he is a good listener. So we would patiently clear the doubt well, even though the doubt raised is pretty small. It is very important that all the students don’t perceive things at the same pace, so it important to clarify even the small doubts. So back in my college, I have asked a doubt to my maths teacher, even though he has excellent knowledge, he considered my doubt as silly and couldn’t clear my doubt. So I don’t consider him as an effective teacher.
Lastly, if the teacher is able to relate well with the students, then he is definitely making the class effective and tapping the passive attention of students. And then eventually make students to learn a lot from the class.
In conclusion, the important trait of a teacher is to have sufficient knowledge about the area and able to communicate the information well with students.
- TPO-03 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 61
- A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 71
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 76
- Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, well, whereas, as to, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1950.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 412.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73300970874 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7830313429 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458737864078 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.9 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.471859607 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.631578947 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6842105263 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05263157895 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329277664101 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107172613591 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133809241815 0.0737576698707 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18291654049 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115145092116 0.0645574589148 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.