teachers should reveal their political or social views in the classroom
In the last three decades, education has become very significant for each community. Having said that, teachers are the most influential factor in the learing process, given that they could affect students' ideas and thoughts. From a personal perspective, teachers should not reveal their social or political points of view in the classrom, because they could mislead students, waste their time and trigger a dispute. Below I will strive to explain my supporting points in more details.
The first and foremost point, some teachers have inappropriate political views, which could influence students' thoughts in a negative way. A vivid example that could be given to shed light on that during the Egyptian presidential election in 2013, some high schools teachers had a specific agenda. They wanted the Muslin Brotherhood candidate won, so they started to state their opinion in the classrom. To put it in other way, they tried to convince their students to vote for this candidate, in order to help Muslin Brotherhood part to dominate Egypt. Provided that teachers have unfair political view, they could mislead students. In addition to that, some students look to their teachers as role models and could be influenced by their behaviors. Consequently, teachers should not state their political views in classrooms.
Next, coupled with confusing students, trigger a dispute is another drawback if teachers mention their political perspectives in the classroom. For instance, 5 years ago, my brother was at high school, his teacher opened a social discussion about religious. He posted his view in the class, some students agreed with him; however, others disagreed. My brother mentioned that his teacher could not control the conversation between students. As a result, since this controversial debate in the classroom, the relationship between my brother and one of his close friend has been affected. Therefore, losing a friend could be a negative effect of that behavior.
Ultimately, wasting students' time is another subtle point that should be born in mind. Recently, educating children has become very intricate. in other words, there are an abundance subjects that students should learn about to keep themselves updated. Talking about political or social topics has not academic benefits. A survey conducted by Oxford University found that political or social debates in the classroom could minimize the potential learning outcomes. Therefore, teachers should focus on teaching academic subjects.
Taking everything into consideration, without a doubt, teachers should not post their political ot social points of view in the classroom, not only because that has a detrimental effect on students' academic performance, but also could mislead them. It is suggested that schools inform their teachers about the negative impact of revealing their views in the classroom.
- tpo 20 the policy of let it burn and its effect on Yellowstone park 81
- Agree or disagree. Successful people try new things and take a risk rather than only doing what they already know how to do well? 73
- At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. 73
- solutions to prevent birds from being injured by window glass 85
- tpo 30 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...which could influence students thoughts in a negative way. A vivid example that could be given to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ing children has become very intricate. in other words, there are an abundance sub...
^^
Line 9, column 370, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...revealing their views in the classroom.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, look, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, talking about, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2435.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45964125561 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76407205246 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535874439462 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 714.6 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.1336878133 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.84 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.472734382372 0.236089414692 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13428985679 0.076458572812 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136843011163 0.0737576698707 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.299434086314 0.150856017488 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117159687032 0.0645574589148 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.