tpo 20 the policy of let it burn and its effect on Yellowstone park
The material discusses if the policy of " Let it burn" causes damage or it is beneficial. While the reading claims that this policy caused severe damage in Yellowstone Park in the summer of 1988, the listening states that fire is a natural part of the ecosystem and the fire that happened in the Yellowstone park was not harmful, on the contrary, it was creative.
First, the author points out that fire caused enormous damage to the park's tree and other vegetation. On the other hand, the professor opposes this and posits that the fire made the vegetation more diverse. The lecturer explains that the fire created unshaded space, which was a favorable condition for some plants. Additionally, some plant species thrived under a high level of heat. As a result, the fire increased vegetation diversity.
Second, the writer brings up that the fire affected the wildlife of the park negatively. Conversely, the lecturer refutes this and contends that the fire created a new opportunity for small animals to thrive, such as rabbits. The professor adds that other animals that hunt rabbits started to increase since their food was available.
Third, the reading mentions that the fire had a negative impact on tourism, so it reduced the local economy. Nevertheless, the professor counters this and brings up that fire could affect tourism if it happens every year. The speaker cits that the fire that happened in Yellowstone park had some conditions that helped it to spread, such as low rainfall. The professor adds that this fire did not occur again since 1988, and the tourists came back to the park the next year and each year after.
- How agnostids have lived 76
- the opinions of celebrities are more important to younger people than to the older people? 73
- solutions to prevent birds from being injured by window glass 85
- using the fuel-cell engine to power cars instead of the internal-combustion engine 76
- tpo 23 the declining of the yellow cedar trees 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, third, while, such as, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 277.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96028880866 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52393306384 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519855595668 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.115648614 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1428571429 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366716789822 0.272083759551 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128102955867 0.0996497079465 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066365485872 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228760072454 0.162205337803 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046266707273 0.0443174109184 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.