teachers were more appreciated in the past
Teachers always were appreciated through the history due to their responsibilty to education and breeding. Eventhough many people belive that they were appreciated before more than now, some belive that the appreciation never changed during time. I beleive that in the past they were more appreciated than now and I support my idea with the following reasons.
First, in the past teachers were the only educators of childeren and people did not have access to lots of resources for education. So, students were dependent to their teachers more than nowadays. Therefore, the teachers were appreciated more by their students and their families for having great role in students education and empowering students to pursue a career in their future. Nowadays by having access to technology the position of teacher have been level down, as lots of educational resources and different options are available.
Also, the society in the past was teacher center not student center. In other words, teachers were like a father or god for the student. They could punish the student or encourage them and the rules were in their favor. Therefore, student should respect them in any circumstances and they had no right to argue. This kind of education led to more respect for the teachers. I
Finally, in the past not all the student have the chance to go to school due to family obligation and less people were educated. So, a teacher at that time had a very important role in peoples life because they studied and were well educated in their time and their advice and approach was much appreciated by others. In indivitualistic society every indivitual has the same say, right, and respect and this gives every person the same respect. Therefore, teachers are not more than students appreciated.
In conclusion, although the meaning of respect had changed by time and their symboles modified, teachers in the past had a more important role in education and therefore were more honoured. Not only they were educated and respected, they were cherished and appreciated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-14 | Vivian Chang | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | Crash | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-25 | can111 | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-14 | reza_fattahi | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-06 | minammah | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The opinions of celebrities such as famous entertainers and athletes are more important to younger people than they are to older people Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 63
- TPO 40 70
- tpo 30
- TPO 45 Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives U 70
- Some parents offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think this is a good idea Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'were'.
Suggestion: were always
Teachers always were appreciated through the history due to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 103, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... to school due to family obligation and less people were educated. So, a teacher at ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, kind of, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1720.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 339.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07374631268 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69499015854 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46017699115 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 548.1 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9747402241 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5555555556 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72222222222 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.469438164404 0.236089414692 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172818566216 0.076458572812 226% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982036145555 0.0737576698707 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.320879562982 0.150856017488 213% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867993774258 0.0645574589148 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.