teachers were more valued and appreciated by the society in the past
Different factors indicate the value of jobs in societies. Meanwhile, changes in cultural or financial properties of countries may increase or decrease the value of some jobs, some others will always receive the same level of appreciation. In my view, teachers are some of those people who never loose their importance in societies, and I will elaborate on my opinion with the following reasons.
First and foremost, countries By developing more, have realized the importance of teachers and appreciate them even more than the past. By having a glance at all well-developed countries, like European countries, all can easily realize how people from those countries appreciate their teachers, and it is all due to the understanding of the role of them in educating the future doctors and engineers. My own life experience is a compelling example of this point. When I was in school, I did not like my teachers, and my treat toward them was somehow rude. When I got older, I realized how much I owe all my teachers, and without them I could not now be this much well-educated. This personal experience is one of the reasons for holding this idea that why I believe teachers never loose their high rank in societies.
Second, the need for education never decreases, and as its result, teachers will not loose their value in societies. Although there are lots of online classes which give people this chance to learn anything from anyone, but teachers are still the main part of each education education system in all countries, and due to the need of having them for being well knowledgable, they always keep their value in societies. As an example, I can mention my aunt, who is a teacher and a manager in a school. Last year, one of her students decided to leave the school and keep going by online classes. After some months, she came back to school and asked my aunt for registering her in classes. She stated that although she could have lots of fun by taking online classes, but they were not good enough, and she could not learned a lot. In my view, till the day people have a desire of learning, they will appreciate teachers, and they will not receive less value even in a far future.
To sum up, each job which serves a role in making a positive change in the world will always get appreciation. Teachers are those who train the people who will change the world in the future, and also people will always need them to have a good education. Based on these justification, my conviction is that, no matter what time we are in, a teacher will always be ranked as a person who all admire him.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-14 | Vivian Chang | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | Crash | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-25 | can111 | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-14 | reza_fattahi | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-06 | minammah | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends 70
- advantages and disadvantages of using smart cars 80
- solitude can teach us a lot 70
- is contribution between science and engineering more important than artists and writers? 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 297, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...hers are some of those people who never loose their importance in societies, and I wi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 783, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
... idea that why I believe teachers never loose their high rank in societies. Second...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...s, and as its result, teachers will not loose their value in societies. Although ther...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: education
...eachers are still the main part of each education education system in all countries, and due to the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 813, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'learn'
Suggestion: learn
...were not good enough, and she could not learned a lot. In my view, till the day people ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 266, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this justification' or 'these justifications'?
Suggestion: this justification; these justifications
...them to have a good education. Based on these justification, my conviction is that, no matter what ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, still, well, while, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2146.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 459.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67538126362 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62488810141 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477124183007 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 666.9 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 11.0 1.86738351254 589% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5804351683 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.947368421 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1578947368 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21052631579 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161402899883 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529948491746 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683229857523 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0901095180708 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030926718463 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.