Technology has changed the way we communicate, but not for the better. Do you agree or disagree?
Technology has improved many aspects of peopele's lives including communication. Although some people argue that technology has changed badly the way people communicate, they forget the amount of money that people spent to deliver a message to a person living far through transport. Technology has changed the way people communicate for good because people create many friends, deliver message in a short period time, and eliminage loneliness.
Firstly, nowadays people using technology especially social media has created a large number of friends than before. Social media allow people to enjoy distant communication; for example, in 2017 I was talked to my aunt on facebook who has been living in the U.S. which was something I could not do by flying because I did not have enough money. Hence, technology made a significant change to the lives of people.
Secondly, messages are easily delivered in short period of time than it was before. There are many emergency messages that are transmitted by technology which are saving properties of people. For example, in many countries there are emergency numbers to call for the police in case of there is theft so that they can provide help in a short amount of time possible, which was different long ago because people could run to the police to tell them what happened when all things were already stolen. Therefore, technology has saved properties of people through delivering the message on time.
Thirdly, people are no longer lonely due to technology. The use of social media provided the room for discussion with other other people through viewing their posts and comments. For example, I never feel bored when I am in holidays because I can always chat and view the comments of my friends put on whatsap and other social media. Thus, technology has helped people to enjoy life through social interaction on social media with others.
To sum up, technology helps in many emergenies, reduces suicides which were due to loneliness, and allows people to create many friends. Although there are some few disadvantages of technology, the points above show that it has made a good change in people's lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-25 | pezhmanlamei | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-13 | jimHsu | 76 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 80 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ogy especially social media has created a large number of friends than before. Social media allow...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 50, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... messages are easily delivered in short period of time than it was before. There are many emer...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...short amount of time possible, which was different long ago because people could ...
^^
Line 7, column 119, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: other
...a provided the room for discussion with other other people through viewing their posts and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, for example, in short, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1811.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08707865169 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64218207557 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51404494382 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3699147368 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.1875 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148551472237 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575743342554 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423850101855 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0911227101702 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474228373999 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.