As technology develops rapidly, the vibrant discussion about whether technology decreases children's creativity has aroused public concerns. When it comes to the negative impacts of technology, people are easily reach the consistent conclusion that advantages of technology outweighs disadvantages. As far as I am concerned, the negative impacts of technology have been greatly exaggerated.
First of all, digital classroom, a secondary classroom for students leaning, has been gradually attracting public attention. Especially, for those people who can't fully understand the course contents in traditional class, they will get their problems addressed on the Internet by taking the digital class. Even though teacher is always the one who takes an important role in improving student's academic performance, however, it's nearly impossible that they could offer assist in any time. Therefore, digital classroom bridges this gap. What's more, educational resources are at unbalanced level. While a great number of teachers assemble in major cities, there are only few teachers teaching in one school in remote areas. Educational resources are in high demand in those regions. Digital classroom can combat this problem effectively and enable those students in remote areas to share the same educational resources as developed regions. Thus, abundant knowledge on the Internet contributes to student's creativity to a large extent.
In addition, it's undeniable that powerful computation ability and a variety of office software boost people's productivity and efficiency. In the past, people had no choice but to do repeatable work due to deficiency in assistant tool. As a result, a vast majority of time was wasted on meaningless work. Nonetheless, computer is equipped with powerful computation capability, greatly enhancing colossal amounts of efficiency. Meanwhile, a variety of office software can also work as labor-saving tool. Excluding unnecessary time, people can dedicate immense time to immerse themselves in intellectual activities. Therefore, technology has a positive effect on increasing creativity.
To sum up, based on the above arguments, I firmly draw the conclusion that technology can promote the creativity.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ntion. Especially, for those people who cant fully understand the course contents in...
^^^^
Line 3, column 537, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...re, digital classroom bridges this gap. Whats more, educational resources are at unba...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, in addition, as a result, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1907.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 328.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.81402439024 4.8611393121 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08904960607 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631097560976 0.524837075471 120% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.51630824373 125% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7749607165 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.35 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114197347573 0.236089414692 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0307742689783 0.076458572812 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474892021646 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0720221327441 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540116583743 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 58.1214874552 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.12 10.9000537634 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.01818996416 124% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.