Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past

Essay topics:

Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.

Society has been changing considerably since the advent of advanced development of technology which never grows as strong as it does nowadays. Some may allege that technology benefits people and makes us creative because there are more subjects we can search for online. Moreover, I believe that technology can harm children’s creativity while providing some advantages.
First of all, technology delays children's development of mind which causes a decrease in creativity. Children are now depending on technology to do homework, do creative writing, and so on. And these can trigger not using their own originality to accomplish work and then leads to a delay in the development of the mind. The lack of development in the mind can cause unable to be creative. However, kids in the past are given chances to think about everything independently, which can cause them to be imaginative and exercise their brains.
In addition, people have too much reliance on modern technology. We could scan any word on the internet, and we could find unlimited information about it through the net. The phenomenon is common and happens a lot to students. A student needs to build a model and includes information about the thing he or she builds. That kid can just search online and copy a model that is on the web and paste the blogged information of that model. Yet, children in the past needed to make and brainstorm about the model on their own, so their creativity was enhanced. But it is unlikely that today’s children will also do it.
Still, opponents may outcry that with the development of technology, amusements can perhaps improve the imagination of kids because they can provide creative ideas. Nonetheless, when children are addicted to these entertainments on electronic devices, the consequence can be severe. Children may understand those electronic devices as helpers and will then rely on them. The effects can be love spending time alone which may be ordinary and doing all work and papers with these devices without even thinking. It can of course cause children to be less inventive and may even write a full essay task on tests.
In nutshell, the fact that children are immersed in electronic devices is grievous, because it can destroy children’s originality. Even though there can be a small number of benefits that advanced technology brings, the negatives are immense. Adults can prevent technology devastate kids’ imagination and exceed the creativity of kids in the past.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-08 nguyenthaian0127 90 view
2023-08-21 yuktapradeep 60 view
2023-06-09 theprasad 66 view
2023-05-18 fanassertive 71 view
2023-05-18 weiwei 70 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Julie.Zhu :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'alleges'.
Suggestion: alleges
...as strong as it does nowadays. Some may allege that technology benefits people and mak...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 110, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...uses a decrease in creativity. Children are now depending on technology to do homework, do creati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...s originality. Even though there can be a small number of benefits that advanced technology bring...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, still, then, while, in addition, of course, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 9.8082437276 234% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2092.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 409.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11491442543 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86435509357 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533007334963 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.487121091 48.9658058833 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.9565217391 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7826086957 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209837168778 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646259181544 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570970202466 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128959373356 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336248345456 0.0645574589148 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.