There is no shortage of debate whether the government should interfere in solving problems of people's daily life or not. I firmly believe that people cannot solve all their problems by their own or their family and assist of government is vital. I feel this way because of two main reasons that I am going to describe as follow.
There is no shortage of debate whether the government should interfere in solving problems of people's daily life or not. I firmly believe that people cannot solve all their problems by their own or their family and assist of government is vital. I feel this way because of two main reasons that I am going to describe as follow.
First and foremost, persons cannot find an explanation to all their problems themselves. Variety conflictions during daily life are huge enough that a specific person cannot determine how to get out of a predicament it even by recommendations of others. To assist mankind in these situations, there should be a third party that has a power to solve it. As an example, if we were in an economic recession in the country, some sort of products would be scarce. Therefore, finding a good like rice can be utterly difficult. Accordingly, having other people's guidance wouldn’t make rice available. Therefore, considerations of governments can remove the barriers to finding the product in this kind of situation. On the other hand, numerous difficulties in the daily life are against the law. the citizens of a country cannot solve them on their own. Constitutional interference is required to stop people to have violent reactions against each other.
Secondly, people follow their advantages and solving their complications by their own can have significant effects on others in the community. Humankind tends to maximize his utility. As a result, this maximization wouldn’t achieve unless by minimizing the utility of the other people in the society. As a matter of fact, to inhibit this kind of activities interference of the governments are necessary since the state can inhibit these kinds of activities and suggest another solution to the involved individual.
In a nutshell, I believe that authorities should help people to find a solution for some sorts of the problems. This is because some conflictions in the life are big enough that finding a solution for it is impossible for a particular person and people's solution can have a tremendous influence on others.
- agree or disagree. It is not necessary to have access to the Internet to live a full life 73
- or schools, assessing teachers’ teaching efficiency is a very important issue. But is it better for other teachers to assess or let students assess teachers? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: All university students should take basic science courses regardless of their fields of study. 76
- Some people think university professors should spend more time doing research while others think they should spend more time educating students What is your view 70 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 319, Rule ID: AS_FOLLOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as follows'?
Suggestion: as follows
...ain reasons that I am going to describe as follow. First and foremost, persons cannot fi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 796, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... in the daily life are against the law. the citizens of a country cannot solve them...
^^^
Line 3, column 520, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er solution to the involved individual. In a nutshell, I believe that authoritie...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, i feel, kind of, sort of, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 346.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11271676301 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02696100072 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514450867052 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1422307903 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1052631579 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2105263158 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42105263158 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.495420258356 0.236089414692 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14705335695 0.076458572812 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.196619905949 0.0737576698707 267% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.339323324127 0.150856017488 225% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.278701138191 0.0645574589148 432% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.