today people spend more time for enjoyment instead of doing their tasks
No one can deny that there are positive and negative aspects of spending too much time on personal enjoyment. But if I forced to talk about this matter, I would definitely disagree with this statement. It is my firm belief that spends time for enjoyment things are not contradict other responsibilities. For a number of reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
My primary reason is that spending time on personal enjoyment and doing things we like to do is necessary for increasing performance during our responsibilities and as a result, our performance represents greater. I have to admit that my opinion on this issue profoundly influenced by my own experience. You see when at the weekend I spend more time doing things that I like to do, my mood change and improving and I have more enthusiasm and impetus for doing things that I should do. As a result, I can focus better on my responsibilities and consequently better performance.
Second, with spend time for enjoyment people can achieve a healthy body. I believe that some activities represent as an exercise for the body and make you fit. Drawing from my own experience I spend my time hanging out with my friends or diving in my favorite music with dance. Moreover, such activities above are personal enjoyment for me and keep my body healthy and fit. It's certainly clear to see why I think doing a thing that you like is a critical key in a busy and stressful life.
In light of the above-mentioned reasons, I strongly believe that spending time on enjoyment not only has an important role in increasing performance in the stressful life of people but also makes our mind and body healthy and energetic.
- telling the truth in relationships 66
- The reading passage claims that the zebra mussel has long been spreading out from their habitats and believe this invasion can not be stopped and makes a lot of threat for freshwater fish However the professor in the lecture casts doubts on the points mad 76
- The reading passage claims that Peary did reach the North Pole and provide strong supports for his claim However the professor in the lecture casts doubts on the points made in the reading 76
- represents several measures have been proposed to stop the spread of the cane toad in Australia 76
- assembles a group of people into a team 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'talking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: talking
... on personal enjoyment. But if I forced to talk about this matter, I would definitely d...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'contradicted'.
Suggestion: contradicted
...pends time for enjoyment things are not contradict other responsibilities. For a number of...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, moreover, second, so, thus, i think, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 294.0 407.700716846 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81972789116 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97486851107 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 212.727598566 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4143765745 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.214285714 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30024364435 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109696119629 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100127992271 0.0737576698707 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187492303314 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372250991274 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.