Friendship is good example of communication and they are our chosen family. Therefore, some people believe that, hold dear their precious amigos is far preferable to generate new companion constantly. I agree statement that to cherish old friends is the most essential perspective and it will influence people's life in a various ways.
In the first place, a long-lasting friend is shoulder to cry on. In all circumstances such as involving a lot of trouble or getting blood out of stone, they can be good listener and give advise which is cooperative. Partner who can understand no matter what happens their friend can be trustworthy and through thick and thin. This is one of the most outstanding personality which is criterion of real mate.
In the second place, birds of a feather flock together is complicated to find and it is a good fortune to have friend who like two peas in a pod. Argue with each other about hobby, fashion or interest is exhausting, also it can menace to friendship. As opposed to, when your mate has similar taste like you is cheerful to shopping and effortless to discuss.
Lastly, making new friends is time consuming, due to the fact that it requires to know someone inside out, whereas old buddy is lifesaver because he can understand what you want. On top of that, we will feel more comfortable when real mate is around.
In a nutshell, although making new friends is great way to improve social life, protecting old companions is the most significant factor to living in this harsh world.
- Essay topics: TPO 45- independent writing taskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their o 76
- TPO 54. The Salton Sea in California is actually a salty inland lake. The level of salt in the lake's water—what scientists call its salinity—has been increasing steadily for years because the lake's water is evaporating faster than it is being repla 86
- TPO 54- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. 76
- TPO-52. Integrated Writing Task. Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage. 83
- Do you agree or disagree? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 330, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'way'?
Suggestion: way
...ill influence peoples life in a various ways. In the first place, a long-lasting fr...
^^^^
Line 2, column 187, Rule ID: GIVE_ADVISE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'advice' (a noun)?
Suggestion: advice
...one, they can be good listener and give advise which is cooperative. Partner who can u...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce, birds of a feather flock together is complicated to find and it is a good for...
^^
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'friended'.
Suggestion: friended
...o find and it is a good fortune to have friend who like two peas in a pod. Argue with ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 80, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'knowing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: knowing
...uming, due to the fact that it requires to know someone inside out, whereas old buddy i...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, lastly, second, so, therefore, whereas, such as, in the first place, in the second place, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1266.0 1977.66487455 64% => OK
No of words: 263.0 407.700716846 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81368821293 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75333483146 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.642585551331 0.524837075471 122% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 618.680645161 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0116680631 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3846153846 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 5.45110844103 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142693522674 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043840831893 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361620780653 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0761884895467 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279951004775 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.