Over the last few years, using fewer cars in the future than today has been in the center of a global debate. Some people are of the belief that in twenty years people will use fewer automobiles than today while others contradict with this view for some reasons. I am also of the opinion that there will not be fewer cars using by people in the future in comparison with today.
One important reason behind this issue is that technology is absolutely advancing every day and people are willing to utilize new technology in their life. The technology never likes to lose its customers because these clients bring a lot of money for technology producer. Although technology may change the model and style of cars, it will not reduce the number of them. It means that technology strives to improve cars instead of omitting them. For instance, cars now work with petrol and gas that causes a wide range of problems( such as air pollution, developing diseases), but with advancing of technology, these cars replace with those which, work with air, water, and renewable resources. Additionally, nowadays every person in a family tends to have a private car because they want to do their work on time without any delay due to lake of a car. For example, I did not have a car last year so I always had to wait for my parents to lend me their cars and so I could not do my work regularly every day. Therefore, I decided to buy a car and now I am so convenient and comfortable and do my work without any stress.
Moreover, I do believe that the lifestyle of individuals has been dependent on using cars. Therefore, without cars, people cannot do their work and even may disturb the entire world. It means that people always perform their works by using cars. As an illustration of this, consider the following example. People go to work by their cars every day and some of them have not easy access to their workplace so have to drive their cars. Additionally, people have accustomed to using cars for any easy works like buying their needs from a near shop. Thus, without cars, people will not be able to live.
Essentially, although cars have a cascade of difficulties for our life and environment, people are considerably dependent on them. From my point of view, the number of cars not only will not decrease but also rise during coming years. As mentioned above, advancing technology and changing lifestyle will cause to increase the number of cars.
- TPO-01 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reaso 73
- TPO-11 - Integrated Writing Task A recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature,novels, plays, and poems,than they used to. This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public, for 85
- integrated writing TPO14 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- TPO-04 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 311, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increasing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: increasing
...ology and changing lifestyle will cause to increase the number of cars.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2021.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66743648961 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50558103154 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484988452656 0.524837075471 92% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1602600602 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2380952381 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.619047619 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38095238095 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183483126688 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652447661729 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550812359915 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130422021803 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825108498778 0.0645574589148 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.