Every one has their own preferred way in raising their children, and all of them have their own strength and weaknesses. I strongly believe that playing computer games is a waste of time and children should not be allowed to play. Someone can consciously weigh the pros and cons. The reasons will be explored in the following essay.
To begin with, computer games decrease the ability of the child to focus on their studies. Some kids are even obsessed with those games. When spending so much quality time playing, there would be less hours to study and do their homework. Also, school grading gets harmed vigorously, and kid's future can be ruined at sensitive ages. If a child have salient exams and he lost the time he has for studying in gaming, then a dramatically low score is the expected result. Focusing on the game will overlap the attention on books and the student becomes lost in an enormous ocean of material that is needed to be covered in order to climb the stairs of success.
Furthermore, computer games lead the child to lose his thinking ability and creativity, which are the most essential in developing a child's brain. When a kid only thinks of the rules and regulations of his favorite computer game, he stops reasoning what is really basic in his path. A child who play games over and over again, becomes extremely robotic in his acts and behavior. Also, obsession with characters in his games is so dangerous that it might make him lose his identity and cut down his personality development. I believe that this is a very devastating effect.
From another perspective, Children playing computer games are more prone to obesity and health issues. A child who spends too many hours sitting in front of a wide bright screen would definitely mess with his vision and eye cornea. Some kids may also be obligated to wear a thick eyeglasses to fix what the computer resulted in. The harmful ultrawaves sent from the screen can also affect the brain and the nervous system. Studies are now showing that the percentage of children who spent more than three hours focusing on a computer screen are more possible to have autism Vs those who are not allowed by their parents to game.
As a conclusion, computer gaming is very dangerous to children in all the aspects of his life. Parents should be extremely careful with what they expose their children to, since this affects a whole generation.
- TPO-48 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 76
- TPO-21 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 81
- TPO-05 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do.Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 90
- TPO-14 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-21 - Integrated Writing Task Genetic modification, a process used to change an organism’s genes and hence its characteristics, is now being used to improve trees through genetic modification. It is possible to create trees that produce more fruit, g 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: LESS_DOLLARSMINUTESHOURS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer hours'?
Suggestion: fewer hours
...ch quality time playing, there would be less hours to study and do their homework. Also, s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun hours is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ch quality time playing, there would be less hours to study and do their homework. A...
^^^^
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'eyeglass'?
Suggestion: eyeglass
...s may also be obligated to wear a thick eyeglasses to fix what the computer resulted in. T...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 179, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...at they expose their children to, since this affects a whole generation.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, may, really, so, then, as for, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2001.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77565632458 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47716141652 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54892601432 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4982399373 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9545454545 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0454545455 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.04545454545 5.45110844103 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225046330379 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717615767432 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852794101654 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139756121142 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634107931328 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.