Even though there is a widely held notion that accessibility to too much information might cause issues, I subscribe to the view that Internet has been a precious bridge for us, to reach the ocean of information, and accordingly, we should maximize the exploitation of utilizing that information. My reasons for supporting this opinion are organized as follows.
First of all, the Internet has provided us with convenient access to several sources of information, such as websites, online libraries, and social media. Not only can one find the answers to his or her problems, but also can interact with many experts in various fields through different tools available thanks to the Internet. For example, when I was founding my small engineering company, I had a severe problem with computer programming and producing high-quality applications for customers. However, within a few months, I managed to gain expertise utulizing abundant materials of which I made use in online platforms. It would have cost our company significantly if we had not decided to approach our problem in this way.
Secondly, I agree to some point that accessing an immense amount of data might be confusing and could challenge people, but I have a heartfelt belief that this is the case when an individual is not atrained to use online sources. To be more specific, if people appropriately were taught how to use different sources, and they were familiar to the functionality of different frameworks provided by the Internet, neither would they be confused, nor would there be any acute issues associated with the abundance of information.
Furthermore, it is not the Internet that has generated that information; the information had existed all the time. The Internet has just created an instant way to access those data; therefore, in my view, the Internet should not be blamed for the consequences of the availability of a lot of information. One can properly restrict the sources which want to adopt in order to organize the level and the amount of information which may want to use.
With all being said, I think the Internet is a valuable asset to which we have access nowadays. We need to be vigorous in spending as much we could to teach and train individuals to learn more of it due to the fact that the more people incorporate the Internet in their lives effectively, the more developed society we would have as a result.
- TPO 10 Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 84
- Technology made children less creative than past 78
- Independent TOEFL essay TPO 8 Agree or disagree Television advertising directed towards young children aged two to five should not be allowed 83
- Technology made children less creative than past 78
- Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when our grandparents were children. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, i think, such as, as a result, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2017.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99257425743 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95933931768 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544554455446 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.856156873 48.9658058833 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.071428571 100.406767564 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8571428571 20.6045352989 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6428571429 5.45110844103 214% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246292390512 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082941690467 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464043965273 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131780863108 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199367604422 0.0645574589148 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 11.7677419355 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.