All parents try to equip their children with the best merits and qualities that enable them to be successful individuals in the future. In my opinion, kids should learn how to manage their money at an early age. I feel this way for two main reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, youngsters who learn how to spend their money effectively are likely to grow as responsible persons. They will realize that there is nothing in this life can be taken for granted. The more you struggle on all aspects of life, the higher lucrative job and comfortable life you will get. My personal experience is a completing example of this. My father taught me that I should study well to deserve pocket money. Moreover, he always advised me to spend it wisely and not exceed the limit of specific amount. what is more, I should not ask for extra pounds, unless I have a good justification or reason. I was reluctant at the beginning, but my parents convinced me that they were doing what is best for me, which proved to be true.
Another noticeable reason is that adults will save some deposit for any possible shortage of income. In this rapidly changing world, no one can predict what could happen in the future, so it is very discreet behavior to save some of your gains for any future emergency. For instance, my close friend suddenly became ill and needed an urgent surgery, but unluckily he did not own the full required sum. I was saving a good amount of money because I used to do this since my childhood. Therefore, I gave the needed fees for the hospital and my friend did the surgery and he is enjoying his good health now. A penny saved is a penny gained.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that we should teach our kids how to manage their money. This is because they make them more responsible and it will save them money for the hard times.
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing Task Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses expla 85
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people 83
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 80
- TPO-06 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reason and example to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to pocket'
Suggestion: to pocket
... me that I should study well to deserve pocket money. Moreover, he always advised me t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 524, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: What
...ot exceed the limit of specific amount. what is more, I should not ask for extra pou...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 340.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52058823529 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40399573663 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576470588235 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5463636528 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.8947368421 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8947368421 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26315789474 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179500604782 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571247763858 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560667853582 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123118700974 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549471502662 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 11.7677419355 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.64 10.9000537634 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.