Teachers, like every human being, have the right to have their own political and social inclinations. I agree with the statement that teachers should not make their social or political views known to their students in the classroom. I will explain the reasons for my stance in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, someone once said " Do not give me a fish, but teach me how to fish". In the contemporary world, the role of the teachers should be providing the learners with the necessary skills and techniques of critical thinking. The pupils must learn how to investigate and examine every new aspect in life, they to establish their own judgement. Having said that, the educators showed not influence their students with their personal social or political opinions. If the teachers revealed their own stance about the debatable issues, their views would cloud the judgement of their students regarding the same topics. Hence, I envision the teacher must keep their perspective in a grey area as much as possible. That is due to the fact that any learners will be more creative and authentic if not influenced emotionally by his instructors. in a nutshell, give your student the recipe and ingredients instead of giving him or her a ready-made meal.
Furthermore, it is completely normal for any individual to change their opinions about many arguments within time due to many factors. This swing between different opinions if revealed to your students could baffle them, moreover it may paint a grim picture about their teacher personality who is not able to adhere to one opinion. As a whole, they could not feel confident about their teacher attitudes any more. It goes without saying that preserving the right image of a confident teacher is far important than any other factor in the education process. In other words, a discreet teacher would leave a distance between his or her personal opinions and the values he or she teaches in the class.
In conclusion, I do believe that teachers should not make their social or political views known to their students for two reasons, which are, they should not influence their students judgment or risk affecting their image in the eyes of their students.
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing Task Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses expla 85
- TPO-26 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.Use specific r 70
- You have attended a panel discussion on the qualities that make a good leader. You have made the notes below.Personal qualities important in a successful leader•Communicates effectively•Is persuasive•Inspires othersSome opinions expressed in the dis 73
- TPO-16 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-10 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 856, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...luenced emotionally by his instructors. in a nutshell, give your student the recip...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, then, in conclusion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1858.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 371.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00808625337 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64869477654 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522911051213 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5593824916 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.294117647 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8235294118 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41176470588 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298402907792 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10172288315 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124138796936 0.0737576698707 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224319799342 0.150856017488 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106481853181 0.0645574589148 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.