Yes, I agree with the statement that in order to be well informed in any aspect, a person should get information from different sources. According to my view, one person should not make any decision without haven complete information about it. This information can be made known only be looking at different resources. I would be explaining with some instances to support my opinions in further paragraphs.
One of the way to become savvy in any particular aspect is through get information from different media. For example, last month, bus driver's strike held in my city and all the buses were held back and blocked the public transport service. This news was not not known to everyone. Me and my friends, watched a television news, listened to the news that got telecast in radio, read news in newspapers. By the help of different media, we got confirmed that there is a strike held and the public transport are blocked. We then started thinking of alternatives to attend our college classes as we did not want to miss the important classes either.
Another example where a person needs to be well-informed before proceeding to next step is in the field of research and development. For example, my uncle is a scientist in ISRO, Indian Space Research Organization. He has invented many things in the development of software for rocket's automatic management of fuel usage. For him to develop such a design, he should be a savvy in the field of designing a tool, its behavior, its boundary conditions and other information such as fuel characteristics. Only be knowing all the information he can build a robust tool to make his idea of fact successful. Without having this knowledge, it would be difficult to proceed with the idea.
These above two examples clearly reflects the importance of knowing facts form different resources before carrying out anything. I believe that only with the complete knowledge in any aspect would help to proceed with that aspect.
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making. 50
- “Governments are justified in circumventing civil laws when doing so is vital to the protection of nationalsecurity.”Write an essay in which you take a position on the statement above. In developing and supporting yourposition, you should consider way 66
- Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than 50
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating, and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes litt 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: not
...public transport service. This news was not not known to everyone. Me and my friends, w...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 507, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...tion such as fuel characteristics. Only be knowing all the information he can build a robu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, then, well, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 332.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94578313253 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82165099316 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560240963855 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6816441593 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2222222222 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.45110844103 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22170696183 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703619289693 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766682544313 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131453123515 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824238413533 0.0645574589148 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.