In our advancement world nowadays there are plenty of resources to catch up what is happing all around the world. In my opinion, we should get our information from various resources to have the facts fully. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, if we depended on one single resource, we might miss a significant part of valuable information. However, collecting data from many different sides would give us reliable facts. For example, when I was a student in the medical faculty in Aleppo city in Syria, I did not take my local curriculum as the only source. I read medical magazines, searched on the internet and studied Kablan medical books, which are American books to increase my knowledge and have a decent education.
Secondly, we should check our information and news by looking at different resources because some people may be untrustful enough, as a result, the news may be biased. For instance, the political situation in my country Syria is complex. Every channel on T.v besides the reporters may tend to hide some facts or emphasized others. I cannot trust a single report or statement. Otherwise, they would mislead us about what is truly going on in reality. So, I used to watch CNN, BBC and Algazira channel. Moreover, I analyze the news that I heard and processed them carefully in order to have the truth as much as I could.
To sum up, I strongly believe that people should search for information that they need in my different ways. That is because they would have the most reliable facts and they would not miss something important. In addition, they would get rid of the bias that some people could do when they delivered specific information.
- TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task The United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, t 80
- TPO-28 - Integrated Writing Task Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him 75
- TPO-45 - Integrated Writing Task Any student of paleontology will be struck by the fact that a great many animals of the past were considerably larger than they are today. This holds true for species ranging from dinosaurs to most mammals. Just why they w 3
- TPO-40 - Independent Writing Task Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-19 - Integrated Writing Task Many consumers ignore commercial advertisements. In response, advertising companies have started using a new tactic, called “buzzing." The advertisers hire people,buzzers,who personally promote (buzz) products to people 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 141, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ormation. However, collecting data from many different sides would give us reliable facts. For...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e only source. I read medical magazines, searched on the internet and studied Kab...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, i feel, in addition, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 300.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76666666667 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6272588165 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593333333333 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.253248664 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1176470588 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6470588235 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0588235294 5.45110844103 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109380743857 0.236089414692 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0328341895526 0.076458572812 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362699073933 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.062151760529 0.150856017488 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024766359343 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.